|
Last Wednesday The Nation
published a three-page news feature
which talked about a “furore over
federal appointments”. In his
appointments of heads of ministries,
departments and agencies (MDAs),
President Umaru Yar’adua, the article
said, has been in clear violation of the
federal character principle.
However, until the
president’s recent appointment of Malam
Sanusi Lamido Sanusi from Kano State as
governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria,
The Nation said, there were only
pockets of protests against Yar’adua’s
appointments. Sanusi’s appointment, the
newspaper claimed, has since “flung open
the floodgates of protests”.
I searched the article for
evidence of the floodgates of protests
and found only two; Senator Patrick
Osakwe who spoke on behalf of the
Southern Senators Forum and Yinka
Odumakin, a spokesperson of the
Afenifere Renewal Group, who wrote a
companion piece for the main article.
In an apparent effort to
prove its case against Yar’adua, The
Nation reproduced a modified version
of a list that the Insider
newsmagazine had published in its
edition of June 29 as part of its cover
story on what it purported to be recent
postings of senior officers of the
Nigerian Army as General Officers
Commanding, Principal Staff Officers,
Corps Commanders and other senior
appointments.
According to the list, 27 of
the appointments were from the North,
three from the East, one each from the
West and Lagos and none from the
South-South. The list also claimed that
24 of the officers were Muslims, five
Christians and three of unknown
religion.
Without the slightest
equivocation, one can say that even the
most casual glance at the list should
raise suspicions about its authenticity.
First, it had three Commandants
purportedly of Kano State origin whose
postings were not specified. Second, the
list had two names of dead officers from
the North. Third, only those from Kano
State where the current army chief comes
from had their states of origin listed
against their names. Consistency
demanded that others on the list should
have had not only their zones but their
states of origin listed. Clearly there
was mischief afoot.
Where a casual glance of the
list would merely raise suspicions about
the authenticity of the list, a more
thorough consideration of it would
reveal a motive behind it that was
dishonest, to say the least. First,
although the authentic list of the
postings as shown in the table below
does confirm a wide ratio of 22 to 8 in
favour of the North, it is not true that
Muslims outnumber Christians by nearly
five to one as the Insider
claimed. As Table I below clearly
establishes, in the nine years since our
return to civilian rule in 1999, this
year is the first in which Muslims (17)
would outnumber Christians (13) in the
top 30 senior officer cadre. From 1999
until this year Christians outnumbered
Muslims on an average of ten to one.
During President Obasanjo’s first year
there were 28 Christians against only 2
Muslims. It was worse the following
year.
The huge regional gap in
favour of the North is hard to defend,
at least from the ordinary person’s
point of view, but invariably, religion
has been a more potent – and more
destructive – tool of political control
than region or tribe.
In any case whereas it is
hard to defend the huge regional gap in
favour of the North in the latest army
postings, it is instructive that the
vociferous critics of the postings are
completely silent on postings in the Air
Force (where there are 16 Southerners to
14 Northerners) and in the Navy (where
the ratio of 24 to 6 in favour of the
South more than balances the wide gap in
the army in favour of the North).
Now, if there are wide gaps
between the regions in the armed forces,
the same cannot be claimed for political
appointments in the civil sector as the
Table II from the Federal Character
Commission of the appointments of senior
and junior ministers, and permanent
secretaries clearly shows.
The table shows the North
has 7 more posts than the South out of a
total of 85. However, an analysis of a
table of the consolidated manpower
statistics of ministries, departments
and agencies published in the
October/December 2008 edition of the
Federal Character Monitor, a
publication of the Federal Character
Commission, shows clearly that out of 14
states that have exceeded the 3% limit
of employees for each state set by the
FCC, only Benue (4.2%) and Kogi (5.8%)
are from the North. The remaining 12,
Abia (4.1%), Delta (5.9%), Ogun (5%),
Akwa Ibom (4.8%), Cross River (3.2%),
Edo (5.6%), Enugu (3.5%), Imo (7.3%),
Ondo (4.1%), Osun (4.0%) and Oyo (3.5%)
are all from the South.
In sharp contrast the entire
North-West states of Kaduna, Kano,
Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto and Zamfara have
7.5%, barely a shade higher than that of
Imo alone.
As any fair-minded person
can see from these tables alone, it is
not true that President Yar’adua has
Northernized Nigeria. Some sections of
it, yes, but certainly not the whole
country. In all there are over 450 MDAs.
To isolate less than 20 of them headed
by Northerners in order to prove a case
of sectionalism against Yar’adua as many
newspapers have done is not only unfair.
It is downright dishonest.
Some of these newspapers
have rested their claims on the grounds
that these are “choice” MDAs. According
to a circular from the National Incomes,
Salaries and Wages Commission signed by
its Chairman, Chief F.O. Williams, there
are about 83 such “choice” parastatals,
22 in the Special Category and 61 in
Category A.
If those claiming that
Yar’adua has northernised the country
are interested in doing an honest job of
their claim they should have spread
their samples beyond the 20 agencies
they have focused on. If they do, they
are likely to discover that there are as
many, if not more, agencies headed by
Southerners as there are those headed by
Northerners.
Table I
Past COAS, GOC, PSOs, Commanders and
other postings from 1999 – 2009
|
Serial |
Year |
Geopolitical Zone |
|
|
|
|
|
Religion |
|
Region |
|
|
|
|
North
West |
North
Central |
North
East |
South
West |
South
South |
South
East |
Muslims |
Christians |
North |
South |
|
1. |
1999 |
6 |
7 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
28 |
15 |
15 |
|
2. |
2001 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
29 |
11 |
19 |
|
3. |
2003 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
25 |
15 |
15 |
|
4. |
2006 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
26 |
15 |
16 |
|
5. |
207 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
23 |
15 |
15 |
|
6. |
2008 |
6 |
10 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
19 |
21 |
9 |
|
7. |
2009 |
10 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
17 |
13 |
22 |
8 |
|
8. |
TOTAL |
33 |
58 |
23 |
32 |
47 |
17 |
44 |
163 |
114 |
96 |
Table II
Distribution of Heads of Ministries
and Permanent Secretaries by Zone
|
|
Minister |
Min. of State |
Permanent Sec |
|
|
ZONE |
NO. |
NO. |
NO. |
TOTAL |
|
North Central |
4 |
1 |
7 |
12 |
|
North East |
3 |
4 |
7 |
14 |
|
North West |
8 |
2 |
10 |
20 |
|
South East |
4 |
2 |
6 |
12 |
|
South-South |
4 |
3 |
7 |
14 |
|
South West |
5 |
2 |
6 |
13 |
|
TOTAL |
28 |
14 |
43 |
85 |
|