|
Employee Compensation Act 2010: The Role Of Trade Unions-By
Chika Onuegbu
Newsdiaryonline Thurs Aug 18,2011
“Prevention and protection are two essential
factors when considering occupational accidents
and diseases. Without preventive measures, all
victims and their families immediately fall
under the Employment Injury Benefit EIB
coverage, which may seriously harm the financial
sustainability of the EIB scheme itself. On the
other hand, without protective measures through
an EIB scheme, there are no ultimate social
safety nets for the victims and their families
if occupational accidents and diseases occur.
Prevention and protection are the two
indispensible keys to running a functional EIB
scheme.”[2]
1. INTRODUCTION
The
International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that
approximately 2.3 million people die from accidents and diseases
related to work each year. The daily death toll amounts to some
6,300 persons. The ILO also estimates that approximately 337
million occupational accidents occur annually and work-related
diseases affect an additional 160 million people around the
world. These estimates are as staggering as they are frightful.
However the good news
is that each of us either as individuals or groups can do
something to change the situation and reduce these avoidable
deaths and injuries in the workplace. This in my opinion should
be the first choice for any trade union as far as the health and
safety of the workers is concerned; and should continue to
remain so irrespective of the passage into law of the Employee
Compensation Act. This is because it is in the best interest of
the employee and his trade union that no employee is hurt
through work and that the workplace is safe and healthy.
Similarly, as the Iceberg diagram below shows, the indirect
costs of occupational accidents and diseases to the employer are
serious and so it is also in their interest that no employee is
hurt at work or ill through work. Consequently the employers and
the trade unions should work together to ensure that
Occupational Safety and Health is in practice, an integral part
of the day-to-day business of every organisation.
Iceberg Diagram on Costs of Occupational Accidents/Diseases to
Employers[3]

To achieve this , it is my considered view that
trade unions should ensure that all employers of labour
have good and functional occupational safety and health
management systems. This is because occupational
safety and health management systems(OSHMS) aim to develop a
comprehensive approach to managing health and safety hazards,
including legal obligations to provide a workplace free of risk,
ensuring continuous improvement of health and safety in the
workplace, and reduction of the costs arising from workplace
accidents, illnesses and workers’ compensation payments. In
addition, the
workers should ensure that they work safely, protect themselves
and not endanger others. The workers should also know their
rights with respect to health and safety and participate in the
implementation of preventive measures. The trade unions should
ensure that Health, Safety and security of their members are
adequately addressed and given priority attention in the
collective bargaining agreements and in the day-to-day
activities of the organisation. The Trade Unions should also
ensure that the various collective bargaining agreements entered
into by them clearly indicate the duties and responsibilities of
all parties with respect to health, safety and security at the
workplace.
The second choice, which is about compensation, however is no
less important. It complements the first choice( i.e. Preventive
measures) and is aimed at ensuring that if and when occupational
accidents and diseases occur, that there is adequate safety net
for the victims. To provide an atmosphere where this can be
achieved, the federal, states and local governments are expected
to put in place laws, regulations and policies that will ensure
that the conditions of work are safe, healthy and secured; and
that injured workers are adequately taken care of and the
families of workers who are killed/hurt because of the job are
not abandoned but adequately catered for.
In furtherance of this constitutional duty[4]
to protect the safety and health of workers, the Nigerian
Government has over the years enacted some legislations designed
to promote the health, safety, welfare and security of workers
including those designed to provide compensation
in the case of
injury/death such as the compulsory life insurance provisions in
the Pensions Act for the welfare of the survivors of a worker
and the various compensations provided for in the Employee
Compensation Act 2010. The main legislations include:
1)
The Factories Act cap 126 laws of the Federation of Nigeria
(LFN) 1990
2)
Workmen's Compensation Act Cap. W6 Laws of the Federation of
Nigeria, 2004
( now repealed by the Employee Compensation Act 2010)
3)
The Minerals oil safety regulation of 1997
4)
The Pension Reform Act 2004
5)
The Harmful Waste (Special Criminal Provisions, Etc.) Act LFN
165 1990
6)
Employee Compensation Act 2010
Kindly permit me to remind us that the focus of this paper is on
the Employee Compensation Act and so I would limit my discussion
to that Act.
2.
OVERVIEW OF THE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT 2010
“The basic objective of an Employment Injury Benefit (EIB)
scheme is to ensure workers and their families a certain level
of income in the case of disability or incapacity for work due
to accidents and diseases related to work. This form of
compensation is a fundamental labour right.”[5]
The signing into law by President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan GCFR
of
the Employee
Compensation Act 2010 which repealed the hitherto Workmen's
Compensation Act Cap. W6 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004
is a welcome development. Prior to the enactment of the Employee
Compensation Act, the
Workmen Compensation Act which was enacted in 1987 was obviously
outdated and needed to be reviewed to bring it closer to
international best practices and
relevant ILO Conventions .This gave rise to the new employee
compensation Act 2010.
The new law makes comprehensive provisions for payment of
compensation to employees who suffer from occupational diseases
or sustain injuries arising from accident at workplace or in the
course of employment[6].The
Act applies to all employers and employees in the public and
private sectors in the Federal Republic of Nigeria except for
any member of the armed forces of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria other than a person employed in a civilian capacity[7].It
also provides that the
Nigeria Social Insurance Trust Fund Management shall have
power to implement the Act and Employees' Compensation Fund (
into which shall be credited all moneys, funds or contributions
by employers for adequate compensation to employees or their
dependants for any death, injury, disability or disease arising
out of or in the course of employment).
The Act also provides that ccompensation
cannot be waived
and that any agreement between the employer and employee to that
effect is unlawful, void and unenforceable and that the employer
is not allowed to deduct (directly or indirectly) from the
employees remuneration for the purpose of the contribution to
the fund.
Part l- (sections 1to 3) Preliminary Provisions, covers
objectives of the act, scope and application, etc. and
exemptions. Section 1 of the Employee Compensation Act 2010 list
the objectives of the Act as follows:
(a) Provide for an open and fair system of guaranteed and
adequate compensation for all employees or their dependants for
any death, injury, disease or disability arising out of or in
the course of employment;
(b) Provide rehabilitation to employees with work-related
disabilities as provided in this Act;
(c) Establish and maintain a solvent compensation fund managed
in the interest of employees and employers;
(d) Provide for fair and adequate assessments for employers;
(e) Provide an appeal procedure that is simple, fair and
accessible, with minimal delays; and
(f)
Combine efforts and resources of relevant stakeholders for the
prevention of workplace disabilities, including the enforcement
of occupational safety and health standards.
Part II -Procedures for Making Claims (sections 4 to 6), covers
procedures for employee's notification of injury, employer's
obligation to report death, injury or disease of an employee and
application for compensation. This part essentially covers the
statutory procedures for reporting and making claims resulting
from workplace injury or disabling occupational disease or
death. A failure by an Employer to make a report as statutorily
required constitutes an offence unless the Employer is exempted
in writing from making such a report by the NSITF Board.
Let me state that observing the procedures as stipulated in Act
are very crucial to receiving the compensations in the Act. For
instance, Section 4(which is reproduced hereunder) stipulates
the procedure for notification in case of injury and also
states under section 4(4) that failure to provide the
information required under Section 4(1) is a bar to a claim for
compensation:.
“4(I) In
every case of an injury or disabling occupational disease to an
employee in a workplace within the scope of this Act, the
employee, or in case of death the dependant, shall within 14
days of the occurrence or receipt of the information of the
occurrence, inform the employer by giving information of the
disease or injury to a manager, supervisor, first aid attendant,
agent in charge of the work where the injury occurred or other
appropriate representative of the employer, and the information
shall
Include -
(a) The name of the employee;
(b) The time and place of the occurrence; and
(c) In ordinary language, the nature and cause of the disease or
injury if known.
4(2) in the case of a disabling occupational disease, the
employer to be informed of the death or disability is the
employer who last employed the employee in the employment to the
nature of which the disease was due.
4(3) the employee shall, if he or she is fit to do so and on
request of the employer, provide to the employer particulars of
the injury or occupational disease on a form prescribed by the
Board, and supplied
to
the employee or the dependant by the employer.
4(4) Failure to provide the information required under
sub-section (1) of this section is a bar to a claim for
compensation under this Act, unless the Board is satisfied that
the -
(a) Information, although imperfect in some respects, is
sufficient to describe the disease or injury suffered;
(b) Employer or the employer's representative had knowledge of
it; or
(c) Employer has not been prejudiced, and the Board considers
that the interests of justice require that the claim be
allowed.”
Part III- Compensation For Death, Injury Or Disease ( sections
7- 16) ,covers
compensation for injury,
compensation for mental stress, compensation for occupational
disease, compensation for hearing impairment, compensation for
injuries occurring outside the normal workplace, limitation of
actions, subrogation, etc. It provides under section 7(1 to 4)
that:
7(1) any employee, whether or not in a workplace, who suffers
any disabling injury arising out of or in the course of
employment, shall be entitled to payment of compensation in
accordance with Part IV of this Act.
7(2) an employee is entitled to payment of compensation with
respect to any accident sustained while on the way between the
place of work and -
(a) The employee's principal or secondary residence;
(b) The place where the employee usually takes meals; or
(c) The place where he usually receives remuneration provided
that the employer has prior notification of such place.
7(3) Where an injury disables an employee from earning full
remuneration at the workplace, compensation shall be payable
pursuant to this Act from the first working day following the
day of the injury, except that only a health care benefit shall
be payable in respect of the day of the injury.
7(4) where the injury or disease is caused by accident and the
accident arose out of the employment, unless the contrary is
shown, it shall be presumed that the injury occurred in the
course of the employment.
Part IV-(sections 17 to 30)
Scale Of Compensation,
covers compensation
in fatal cases, compensation relating to enemy warlike actions,
period for making payments, proof of existence of dependants,
permanent total disability, permanent partial disability or
disfigurement, period of payment for permanent total or partial
disability, temporary total disability, temporary partial
disability, health care and disability support, duty of
accredited medical practitioner and other specialists,
retirement benefits, payment of retirement benefits etc. Section
17 provides that where death results from the injury of an
employee, compensation shall be paid to the dependants of the
deceased up to 90 per cent of the total remuneration of the
deceased employee for the widow(er) with two or more children
dependent on the employee, 85 per cent with one dependent child,
60 per cent for 50-year old and above without a dependent child
or an invalid spouse, and 30 per cent for aged below 50 years
but not being invalid and having no dependent children. It
further provides that the Monthly payments to eligible children
shall be made to children up to the age of 21 or until they
complete undergraduate studies, whichever comes first;
Part V- deals with the
Powers and Functions of the Board (NSITF), Part VI Employers'
Assessment and Contributions to the Fund. A key aspect of these
parts of the Act is the Employee Compensation Fund provided in
section 56 and managed by the NSITF.
Section 33 of the
Employee’s Compensation Act provides that “every employer shall
within the first two years of the commencement of this Act, make
a minimum monthly contribution of 1% of the total monthly
payroll into the Fund.” After the first two years, the NSITF
Board is authorised to “… assess employers for such sums in such
manner, form and procedure as the Board may, from time to time,
determine for the due administration of this Act.”It is
important to note that the NSITF Board is further authorised by
Section 33(2) of the Act to from time to time, make regulations
prescribing the categorisation of risk factors of each class or
sub class of industry and the amount of contribution to be made
and for different assessment rates applicable to each class or
sun- class of industry, sector or work place.
3.
THE ROLE OF TRADE UNIONS
Let me once again restate that irrespective of the positive
comments about any law /convention seeking to compensate
employees who suffer from occupational diseases or sustain
injuries arising from accident at the workplace or in the course
of employment, the primary focus of any organisation should be
to provide a safe and healthy environment for the workers to
fulfil their obligations. The issue of compensation, as a second
best choice, should not be the primary focus but a fallback
position; when things go wrong. This is because when a worker
leaves his residence to work for the upkeep of his family and
contribute to the economy of his society and nation, he does so
with a belief that he will come back to the warm embrace of his
family at least the way he was when he left them. He does not
expect that the work will howsoever lead to his death or
disability or injury or ill health. There is therefore no
gainsaying that he has a right to demand this from the society
and the nation and that his employer, the society and nation
have a duty to ensure that this right to safety and health at
work is respected. Moreover the consequences of workplace
fatalities, accidents, injuries, and sickness and disease
conditions are far reaching both to the individual, the employer
and the society. Anyakwe Nsirimovu[8]
has submitted that
‘More than any institutional guarantees respect for human rights
must be inherent in the habits and desires of the people of the
society’.
It is also not surprising that
Section 17 (3) (b and c) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria also recognises the right to health and
safety at work and requires that the conditions of work are just
and humane, … and that the health, safety and welfare of all
persons in employment are safeguarded and not endangered or
abused. Consequently the Trade Unions should continue to
emphasise the primacy of a healthy, safe and secured workplace.
This will include taking reasonable steps to make the employers
ensure that the workplace, machinery, equipment and processes
under them are safe and without risk to health. It also includes
ensuring that the employers recognize the right of the worker to
remove himself/herself from work situations that he/she has
reasonable justification to believe presents an imminent and
serious danger to his/her life or health .It is my considered
view therefore that the primary role of trade unions with
respect to the employee compensation act should be an integral
part of their roles with respect to the health and safety of
workers generally.
Nevertheless, kindly permit me to state below what I consider to
be the specific roles of trade unions with respect to the
Employee Compensation Act 2010:
3.1 Review The Law And Identify Grey Areas For Consultation And
Resolution:
It is my considered view that the first reaction of the trade
unions to any law enacted by the National Assembly or any State
House of Assembly is to carry out a comprehensive review of the
laws through workshops, seminars, corroborative meetings with
other stakeholders. It is also advisable that for a law with
significant impact on the workers like the Employee Compensation
Act, the Trade Union are advised to engage the services of
experienced labour and compensation legal luminaries to carry
out a comprehensive review and evaluation of the Employee
Compensation Act 2010 as well as drawing the attention of
stakeholders to grey areas that could negatively impact on the
implementation of the Act.
3.2 Education of
Their Members and the General Public on the Provisions of the
Act:
Trade Unions must make adequate arrangements to give proper
publicity to the provisions of the Employee Compensation Act
2010. They should also ensure that the key provisions of the Act
are in languages or dialects understood by workers including
illiterate persons. The importance of publicity and mass
enlightenment of the Employee Compensation Act cannot be
overemphasised. For instance Section 4 of the Act , as shown
hereinabove under ‘Overview of the Employee Compensation Act’,
list the procedure for making claims and states under section
4(4) that failure to provide the information required under
Section 4(1) is a bar to a claim for compensation. The fact
remains that unless the employees and their labour unions are
knowledgeable about the key provisions of the Act, the Act would
not serve any useful purpose. Consequently the next most
important duty of a trade union with respect to the Employee
Compensation Act 2010 is to educate her members and the general
public on the key provisions of the Act and ensure that they are
well aware of their rights and responsibilities under the Act.
They are encouraged to summarise the key provisions of the Act
in a bulletin for easy guidance of their members and the general
public
3.3 Monitor
Compliance and Report All Cases of Breach/Non-Compliance
The Trade Unions have a sacred duty to ensure that the Employee
Compensation Act 2010 does not end up as a "paper promise" in
the workplace. They must monitor the compliance of the employers
with respect to the provisions of the Act. They should also
ensure
the Federal Government adequately
staff their various agencies charged with responsibilities of
monitoring compliance with the Employee Compensation Act as well
as provide them with adequate facilities necessary to carry out
their duties. The organised labour (i.e. the Nigeria Labour
Congress and the Trade Union Congress) should also inaugurate
their working committees for the monitoring and enforcement of
the Employee Compensation Act across the country and in each
state of the federation. The NLC and TUC monitoring committees
when formed should ensure that they work in close partnership
with organised private sector and NECA. They should also ensure
that they direct their State Councils to work closely with the
NSITF and National Council for Occupational Safety and Health in
the State to ensure that the Act is seamlessly implemented
3.4 Enforcement of
the Employee Compensation Act 2010
They should recognize that the Government agencies charged with
the enforcement of the Law cannot monitor every workplace. In
practice, the effectiveness of the implementation of labour
protections depends to a very large extent on the worker's
decision to act. Here the Trade unions have a very crucial role
.They should give the workers the relevant information about
their rights/responsibilities and the necessary procedures under
the Act. They must also ensure that they assist the workers
claim their rights by ensuring that these rights are included in
the Collective Bargaining agreement; and that the workers claims
pursuant to the Act are followed through to the end. To this
end, The
Trade Unions should direct each of their branches and
negotiating units to ensure that the Employee Compensation Act
is an integral part of
their collective bargaining agreement with their various
employers. The Employee Compensation Act should be a full
Article in the Collective Bargaining Agreement and the employer
must undertake to comply fully with the provisions of the
Employee Compensation Act 2010.
Trade Union can play further play this role by ascertaining
whether the respective employers are contributing to the fund as
provided in the law. They could instigate NSTIF to publish list
of contributing employers etc. This way the trade unions can
engage their respective employers with the information.
3.5 Promote Dialogue
and Consultative Meetings among Stakeholders
The importance of social dialogue and consultation among the
stakeholders in the
effective management of the Employee Compensation Act cannot be
over emphasised. The organised Labour under the auspices of TUC
and NLC should encourage social dialogue and consultation
amongst the stakeholders with a view to ensuring the smooth and
effective implementation of the Act.
The trade Union should engage NSITF on the possibility of NSITF
maintaining a desk or department of Labour Relations. This way,
NSITF as the implementing body will get first hand feedbacks on
the issues arising from the Employee compensation act. In
addition, the NSITF should decentralise and restructure its
operations to deliver quick service. It should also branches in
all the states of the federation for greater efficiency. The
trade unions should also engage NECA and their respective
employers’ organisation on their preparations for the
implementation of the Employee Compensation Act as well as share
thoughts on practical solutions to identified grey areas.
4. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
At present, there are quite some challenges in the way of
effective implementation of the Employee Compensation Act in
Nigeria. Some of these challenges against the effective
implementation of the Employee Compensation Act 2010 are:
4.1 Culture of
Impunity and Unwillingness to Obey the Law:
The greatest challenge is the culture of ‘catch me if you can’
in the observation of laws in Nigeria and it would be
unreasonable to expect that the implementation and observation
of the Employee Compensation Act 2010 would be different.
Thisday Newspaper Editorial[9]
has also voiced this concern when it stated that
“Ordinarily,
the fact of the president's assent should bring joy to Nigeria's
teeming workforce. But with the nation's record of comatose
policies and unimplemented ideas, the enthusiasm the new law has
generated may be short-lived if the assent is not followed with
decisive action. This is where the Nigeria Social Insurance
Trust Fund (NSITF) comes in.”
Only recently we saw clearly the unwillingness of the State
Governors to respect the National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act,
2011. Rumour also has it
that any moment from now the Federal Government would devalue
the Nigerian Naira to around N200/1USD in an attempt at ensuring
that the benefits of the N18, 000 wages does not accrue to the
workers. This is the usual problem in the implementation of laws
and policies in Nigeria; and it is my considered view that the
Employee Compensation Act 2010 would have its own fair share.
4.2 Non Passage of Bills on Occupational Health and
Safety/Institute of Safety Professionals:
The Employee Compensation Act risks being ineffective as the
Bill for an Act to Repeal the Factories Act and Make
Comprehensive Provisions for Occupational Safety and Health in
Workplaces and for Matters Connected Therewith was not passed
into law by the 6th National Assembly. Similarly the
Institute of Safety Professionals of Nigeria Bill which seeks
inter alia to determine what standard of knowledge and skills
are to be attained by persons seeking to become registered as
safety professionals. The fact is that the first focus of any
law to address workplace health and safety should be prevention.
The two bills that were not passed focuses on prevention. The
Employee Compensation Act focuses on compensation when things go
wrong and as such is only complementary. Consequently, the
employee compensation fund established under the Employee
Compensation Act risks being overwhelmed due to high safety
lapses and may fail. It is therefore my considered view that the
NSITF and organised labour should quickly draw the attention of
the 7th National Assembly to these serious defects
and ensure that these bills are passed to engender an atmosphere
of prevention.
4.3 Employee Compensation When Employer Defaults In Contribution:
The issue of compensating an injured or dead employee
irrespective of whether the employer has complied with the
Employee compensation act 2010 has to be addressed. There
appears to be a gap on how the employee’s right will be
guaranteed while holding a defaulting employer accountable.
There is need for vigilance by trade unions as this could be
exploited to the detriment of workers. This gap should be
addressed in further updates of the act.
4.4 Maximum Mandatory
Period for Compensation:
It is not clear from the maximum duration from the date of
injury or death of an employee within which the employee shall
mandatorily be compensated. This has a potential of worsening
the case of an injured employee or the pains of the family of
dead employees due to prolonged delay in compensation. This gap
could be exploited to deny payment of compensation as it is not
time bound.
4.5 Non-Unionised
Workers, Casualisation and Contract Staff:
Non-unionised workers as experience has shown are the greatest
victims of unsafe and unhealthy work places. Empirical evidence
confirms that the respect for workers’ health, safety and
dignity including the observation of the laws on Compensation
payments are very much likely to be violated for non-unionised
workers, casual workers and contract staff of all categories.
This position is also supported by evidence
available to global unions. For instance, the
International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General
Workers' Unions(ICEM) had noted that
“participants at the
many global and regional ICEM CAL meetings have made reference
to a wide variety of problems faced by contract and agency
labour workers, ranging from employment insecurity and inferior
salaries, pension rights issues and working time problems, to
major health and safety crises and brutal treatment and abuse of
workers”[10].
Moreover since many workers in this category do not have
comprehensive documents on the status of their employment, there
is a potential that employers can disown such employees in the
event of injury or death. In addition, the employers may not
make any contribution with respect to this category of
employees.
Trade Unions should therefore endeavour to unionise all workers
so as to enable them enforce their rights..
It is important if they must continue to remain relevant.
Fortunately section 40 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria, Extant labour laws, Article 10 of African
Charter on Human and People Rights(Ratification and Enforcement
Act) 1990 as well as various ILO conventions 87 and 98
guarantee the right of workers (including contract and
agency staff )to join a trade union for their protection. Trade
Unions should ensure that there should exist a minimum industry
condition of service for workers irrespective of the nature of
their contract, that every organisation providing contract
labour have valid labour recruiter’s license and that they must
commit to full adherence to the conditions in the labour
recruiters license.
I want to respectfully appeal to trade unions to continue to
display courage and solidarity in the protection of the rights
and welfare of Nigerian workers and in the mobilisation of
Nigerians against unpopular government policies.
This in my view is also in consonant with
one of the most fundamental trade
slogans of trade union -
'Solidarity forever ', which means
support by union members
' for each others ' struggles, and
support by the stronger
for the weaker within society.
4.6 Administrative
Capacity of the NSITF:
There are doubts in some quarters as to whether the Nigeria
Social Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF) has sufficient qualified
personnel and appropriate administrative structure for the
effective administration of the Employee Compensation Act 2010.
It is our hope that the NSITF would rise to the challenge and
ensure the effective and
seamless implementation of the Employee Compensation Act
.Already the fact that the effective date for the implementation
of the Act is way behind schedule does not help matters.
4.7 Membership of
Independent Investment Committee:
The Act provides for three Representatives of the most
represented Employees’ organizations as members of the
Independent Investment Committee.
Given that there are two Labour centres namely, the Trade Union
Congress of Nigeria (TUC) and the Nigerian Labour Congress
(NLC), there is a lack of clarity as to how the third employees’
organization representative shall be determined. Moreover, the
tenure of membership has not been stated. It is advised that the
Trade Unions do not allow this ambiguity to break their ranks.
They should collaborate with the Board for an equitable
resolution.
4.8 Cooperation of
Stakeholders:
For the Act to be implemented effectively there must be sincere
cooperation among the stakeholders- organised labour, employers,
NSITF and government at all levels.
4.9 Uncertainty as To
Transition Arrangements:
Although the effective date for take-off of the Employee
Compensation Act was January 1, 2011, the implementation of the
Act is yet to commence in earnest. There are also doubts in some
quarters as to whether the implementation could even commence
this year due to some of the identified challenges. Already some
stakeholders have
started nursing a
proposal for January 2012 effective date. This was however
turned down with a general consensus that factoring all
parameters, NSITF should be in a position to take-off next month
(i.e. July 2011). The
key concern here is what happens to an employee who sustains
injury at work within this period when the implementation is yet
to commence in earnest? Will he /she be compensated under the
repealed workmen compensation Act or will he/she wait aimlessly
until the employee compensation act takes off effectively? I
was confronted with this question and I hope the NSITF will help
me proffer solutions.
Another area of contention is that if the Act took effect in
January 2011 and it gave three months grace period,
automatically billing ought to have started in April 2011. Will
NSITF waive the billings when it effectively take-off or will it
demand arrears from April 1st 2011? Already it is
reported that the Federal Government has set aside N9bln as
take-off grant for the Fund in line with the law.
5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
You will agree with me that the consequences of workplace
fatalities, accidents, injuries, sickness and disease conditions
are far reaching both to the individual, the employer and the
society.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that 270
million work accidents occur annually while 160 million are
estimated to suffer from work-related illnesses.
About 2.2 million die worldwide due to such accidents – a
death toll averaging some 6,000 workers a day.
I would like to think that this figure does not include former
employees whose health is now adversely affected by the work
they did and by the conditions of the place they worked. This
figure, if nothing drastic is done, is sadly expected to grow in
view of the current global financial crises, other emerging
risks and the changing pattern of works. This therefore
underscores the importance and urgency of this paper.
The trade unions must
ensure that provisions of the Employee Compensation Act 2010 are
implemented and that the general attitude to safety and health
in the workplace is greatly improved upon.
They should also take note of the various recommendations
and concerns expressed in this paper.
*Comrade
Higgins Chika Onuegbu JP,FCA is
the State Chairman, Trade Union
Congress of Nigeria (TUC) Rivers
State and the National
Industrial Relations Officer of
Petroleum & Natural Gas Senior
Staff Association of Nigeria
(PENGASSAN). He is also a member
of International Labour and
Employment Relations
Association.He can be reached
on: Tel
08037404222/ Email:
chikaonuegbu@yahoo.com.
Please note that opinions
and comments expressed in this
paper are strictly personal.
[2]International
Labour Organization, 2010:”
Employment injury benefi ts :
occupational accident and
disease insurance systems” . ILO
DWTST and Country Office for
Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
– Moscow: ILO, 2010.Page 20.
[3]
[3]International
Labour Organization, 2010:”
Employment injury benefi ts :
occupational accident and
disease insurance systems” . ILO
DWTST and Country Office for
Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
– Moscow: ILO, 2010.Page 15.
[4]
Section 17 (3) (b and c )
of the 1999 Constitution
of the Federal Republic
of Nigeria
requires that
the conditions of work
are just and humane, …
and that the health,
safety and welfare of all
persons in employment are
safeguarded and not
endangered or abused
[5]
International Labour
Organization, 2010:” Employment
injury benefi ts : occupational
accident and disease insurance
systems” . ILO DWTST and Country
Office for Eastern Europe and
Central Asia.– Moscow: ILO,
2010.Page1.
Please also take note
that the terms “employment
injury benefits”, “occupational
accidents and diseases
compensation/benefits” and
“workers compensation” are
frequently used interchangeably.
“Workers compensation” is the
older term, generally used to
refer to schemes which provide
benefits in the case of death
and incapacity due to accidents
at work and, later, due to
prescribed occupational diseases
as well. The term “employment
injury” is used as the ILO term
to cover both accidents at work
and occupational diseases (ILO,
1986).
[6]
Employee's Compensation Act,
2010- Explanatory note to the
Employee Compensation Act
[7]
Section 3 of Employee
Compensation Act 2010
[8]
Anyakwe Nsirimovu (1997)
Human Rights: An
Umbilical Cord Of Participatory
Democracy. Institute Of Human
Rights And Humanitarian Law.
Page 14
[9]
Thisday Newspaper Editorial
“Nigeria: The Employees
Compensation Act 2010”. 26
January 2011
[10]
ICEM GUIDE ON CONTRACT AND
AGENCY LABOUR 2008 Page 15.
|