|
STATE
CHAIRMAN
TRADE UNION CONGRESS OF NIGERIA (TUC)
RIVERS STATE COUNCILPRESENTED
AT
2010
ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF
THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT OF NIGERIA (CIPMN)
RIVERS STATE BRANCH
Venue: Le Meridien Ogeyi Place, Port
Harcourt
Date: 23rd September 2010
PROTOCOLS!
‘’Ultimately, the impact and
usefulness of a minimum wage policy
depends on whether minimum wages are
paid. This, in turn, depends on the
effectiveness of the enforcement
mechanism; Penalties for violators,
adequate compensation for workers
whose rights have been breached and
suitable resourcing of the
enforcement authority, are all
crucial factors. But the active
involvement of social partners in
both the design and operation of
minimum wage enforcement regimes is
essential to enhance their impact.’’
- International Labour Organisation
(ILO)[1]
1. INTRODUCTION
Let me start by thanking the Rivers
State Branch of the Chartered Institute
of Personnel Management of Nigeria
(CIPMN) for organising this event and
for giving us the opportunity to share
our thoughts on how to make things
better in Nigeria and Rivers State. The
theme for this year’s event is not just
commendatory but also timely. This is
because a post-Recession Economy is a
fragile economy which still requires a
lot of attention in view of the enormous
challenges ahead. It is as delicate as
the handling of a patient showing signs
of recovery from a very serious illness.
You will agree with me that if the
patient is not properly taken care of
his/her situation may relapse even into
a worse condition.
Let me state
that I am delighted to be here today
especially given the importance
Organised Labour
places on
the subject matter of
the
title of the paper I was asked to
present. It suggests that the Institute
and by extension Human Resources
Practitioners in Rivers State and
Nigeria seem ready to take proactive
steps at ensuring that the new Minimum
wage is implemented seamlessly by
employers in both the private and public
sectors including various state
governments without the usual crises
that accompany implementation of minimum
wage in Nigeria. We view it as a right
step aimed at sustaining the existing
cordial relationship between the various
employers of labour and the labour
unions. On the part of organised labour
and more specifically, the Rivers State
Council of Trade Union Congress of
Nigeria (TUC), I want to pledge our
determination to sustain and improve
upon our existing cordial relationship.
I also want to state that we share the
same passion for Economic Recovery of
Rivers State, Nigeria and Nigerians.
You may recall that, just last week the
Rivers
State Council of Trade Union Congress of
Nigeria (TUC)
organised
a workshop in collaboration with the
Federal Ministry of Labour and
Productivity Port-Harcourt on
"Contemporary
Issues In Labour-Management Relations:
Implications For Industrial Output,
Investment And The Nigerian Economy’’,
which was aimed at sharing practical
strategies that will develop and sustain
a peaceful and harmonious industrial
relations environment in the Niger Delta
States and our dear country through the
identification of emerging issues and
their challenges, application of social
dialogue and effective dispute
resolution practices, promotion of
co-operation and partnership among the
industrial relation actors and mutual
respect for their rights and
responsibilities. Let me use this
opportunity to thank members of the
Chartered Institute of Personnel
Management of Nigeria (CIPMN) who as
resource persons and participants made
the workshop very successful. It is a
true demonstration of the burgeoning
partnership between your institute and
organised labour in Rivers State.
Kindly permit me at this stage to go
straight into the meat of today’s
discourse, which is on the new minimum
wage.
Let me state that
I will attempt to
focus
on
Minimum Wage
generally
with emphasis on how the new minimum
wage could be implemented
and managed seamlessly in the
interest of
our post-recession economy and
industrial peace and harmony in Nigeria
and each state of the Federation.
Let me however observe that ‘’Minimum
wage’’ have been the subject of several
serious discourse and practiced by some
countries of the world even before the
International labour Organisation (ILO)
was first created.
It was
‘’first proposed as a way to control the
proliferation of sweat shops in
manufacturing industries. The sweat
shops employed large numbers of women
and young workers, paying them what were
considered to be substandard wages. The
sweatshop owners were thought to have
unfair bargaining power over their
workers, and a minimum wage was proposed
as a means to make them pay fairly."[2]
It is therefore no doubt an important
step in addressing the right to human
dignity at the workplace.
Presently there is now legislation or
binding collective bargaining regarding
minimum wage in more than 90% of all
countries
[3] .
We can therefore say without fear of
contradiction that Minimum wage is a
universal practice.
2.
NATURE AND HISTORY OF MINIMUM
WAGE
Before I continue I would like to make
some attempts at explaining what is
‘Minimum Wage’ as well as throwing some
light on its nature and origin. This in
my view is necessary for us to
appreciate the urgency for its
implementation and the need for its
proper management.
Minimum wage may be defined as
the
‘’rate
of pay fixed either by a collective
bargaining agreement or by governmental
enactment as the lowest wage payable to
specified categories of employees’’[4].
Let me observe that
although
the term minimum wage is not defined in
any of the various ILO instruments
dealing with the manner in which minimum
wages are determined, however in the
1992 General Survey of the reports
relating to Convention No. 131 on
Minimum Wage Fixing , the Committee of
Experts[5]
explained that:
‘’minimum wage may be understood to mean
the minimum sum payable to a worker for
work performed or services rendered,
within a given period, whether
calculated on the basis of time or
output, which may not be reduced either
by individual or collective agreement,
which is guaranteed by law and which may
be fixed in such a way as to cover the
minimum needs of the worker and his/her
family, in the light of national
economic and social conditions.’’
Earlier in 1967 the ILO[6]
meeting of experts on Minimum wage
fixing and related problems had
explained
that the concept of the minimum wage
contains three basic ideas:
(a) The minimum wage is the wage
considered sufficient to satisfy the
vital necessities of food, clothing,
housing, education and recreation of the
worker, taking into account the economic
and cultural development of each country
;
(b) The minimum wage represents the
lowest level of remuneration permitted,
in law or fact, whatever the method of
remuneration or the qualification of the
worker;
(c)
The minimum wage is the wage which in
each country has the force of law and
which is enforceable under threat of
penal or other appropriate sanctions.
It further notes that Minimum wages
fixed by collective agreements made
binding by public authorities are
included in above explanation.
Essentially according to ILO,
‘’ the establishment of a minimum wage
system is often portrayed as a means for
ensuring that workers (and in some
cases, their families) will receive a
basic minimum which will enable them to
meet their needs (and those of their
families); hence the frequent use of the
term ‘minimum living wage’. Efforts to
implement such a concept imply an
attitude or a policy which aims at
improving the material situation of
workers and guaranteeing them a basic
minimum standard of living which is
compatible with human dignity or is
sufficient to cover the basic needs of
workers. Such a policy is in line with
the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights as regards
every person’s right to receive
remuneration equivalent at least to a
wage which makes it possible for workers
and their families to lead a decent
life.’’ International Labour
Organisation (ILO)[7]
Let me also mention that the practice of
Minimum wage has been on even before the
First World War.
Commenting on the origin of the practice
of Minimum Wage, The Microsoft Encarta
observed that:
“The first minimum wage law was enacted
by the government of New Zealand in
1894. A subsequent law enacted by
Victoria State, Australia, in 1896
established wage boards on which workers
and employers were represented in equal
numbers, with power to fix minimum wages
enforceable on the employer. This
innovative law served as the model for
the British Trade Boards Act of 1909.In
the U.S., Massachusetts enacted the
earliest minimum wage law in 1912, and
eight other states followed suit the
next year”[8]
It is also important to note however,
that although the practice of National
Minimum Wage is not new as
aforementioned, the duration, details
and nature of the practice may vary from
country to country. However there seem
to be a revival of sort for the practice
of applying a national minimum wage
since the early 1970s. To this end, M.
Dollé (1999) and Metcalf (1999[9])
observed that the United States and
France are among the countries with the
longest practice in applying a single
national minimum wage. In contrast, in
the United Kingdom, a national minimum
wage was introduced in April 1999.
The case of the United Kingdom is
perhaps most symbolic of the revival of
national minimum wages in developed
countries especially in view of the fact
that the United Kingdom which:
‘’after dismantling its system of
industry level minimum wages in the
1980s, adopted a new minimum wage with
national coverage in 1999. In 2000,
Ireland also introduced a national
minimum wage, for the first time in its
history. Developing countries, too, have
regularly increased their minimum wages
to provide social protection to
vulnerable and non-organized categories
of workers. Large countries, such as
Argentina, Brazil, China and South
Africa, have been among the main drivers
of this upward trend. In China, for
example, new regulations on minimum
wages were issued in 2004 in the face of
growing concerns about the widening of
wage inequality. In South Africa,
minimum wage floors were introduced in
2002 to support the wages of millions of
low-paid workers in different economic
sectors. In Brazil and Argentina, the
minimum wage policy has been revitalized
to help reverse the decline in the wages
of low-paid workers since the early
2000s’’[10]
Here in Nigeria,
arising mainly from the fact that
the government is
both
the regulator and the largest employer
of labour , the actions of government in
the area of wage determination are
usually very fundamental and hence the
history of minimum wage in
Nigeria
cannot be separated from the
history
of public service wage negotiations and
increment, which dates back to the
colonial era and the setting up of the
Hunts Commission in 1934(
Please see the table1 below for a list
of such commissions and committees.).
For instance as early as 1943, the wage
fixing and registration ordinance (no.40
of 1943) had come into force
establishing wage boards modelled after
those of the United Kingdom. Also
in 1946, the British Colonial
Secretary , issued a circular letter to
all heads of government departments
requesting them to take immediate action
to ensure that proper wages and
conditions of labour were observed in
all contracts entered into with the
assistance from the government. This was
the beginning of the ‘fair wage clause’
in government contracts. Off course,
fairness of wages has to be judged with
reference to government’s own wages and
this is a further confirmation that the
wages paid by the government has a more
far reaching implication than those paid
in the private sector.
It is important to note that
the 1943 wage fixing and
registration ordinance was however
replaced in 1957 with the Wages Board
Ordinance (also based on the United
Kingdom Wages Council legislation)
because the procedures for fixing
minimum wages under the existing
ordinances were considered to be clumsy
and subject to basic defects.
In the post-independence Nigeria, the
Federal Government in 1973 enacted the
Wages Board and Industrial Council Act
which empowered the Minister of Labour
to set up machinery for fixing minimum
wages and conditions of service in both
private and public sectors of the
economy. However it was in 1981 that the
minimum Wage in Nigeria was first passed
into law, giving birth to
the National Minimum Wage Act, of
1981 (Official Gazette, 1981, A53-57)
which prescribed a minimum wage of N125
per month , and is the principal Act on
Minimum wage in Nigeria till date.
It was revised after 10 years in 1990 to
N250 per month and revised again in 2000
leading to the amendment of the
Principal Act
by the National Minimum Wage (Amendment)
Act 2000 Laws of the Federation of
Nigeria which prescribed a national
minimum wage of N 5,500 per month. The
2000 Minimum Wage Amendment Act
is
in
the process of being further amended in
2010 based on the recommendations of the
Justice Alfa Belgore led Tripartite
Committee on National Minimum Wage.
|
Table 1[11]:
Civil Service Reform and Wage
Commissions in Nigeria,
1934-2010
|
Year
|
|
Hunts Commission
|
1934
|
|
Bridges Committee of Enquiry
|
1941
|
|
Tudor Davies Commission
|
1945
|
|
Harragin Commission
|
1946
|
|
Miller Commission
|
1947
|
|
Hansbury-Gorsuch Commission
|
1954/55
|
|
Newns Commission, the Elwood
Grading Team
|
1956
|
|
Mbanefo Commission
|
1959
|
|
Morgan Commission
|
1963
|
|
Eldwood Commission
|
1966
|
|
Adebo Commission
|
1970/1971
|
|
Udoji Commission
|
1972
|
|
The Cookey Commission
|
1981
|
|
Dotun Phillips Panel
|
1985
|
|
The Fatai Williams Committee
|
1990
|
|
The Ayida Panel Review
|
1994
|
|
The Phillip Asiodu Committee
|
1998/1999
|
|
Ernest Shonekan Committee
|
2000
|
|
Justice Alfa Belgore Committee
|
2009/2010
|
The National minimum wage rate in
Nigeria is applied to every worker (any
member of the civil service of the
Federation or of a State or Local
Government or any individual who has
entered into or works under a contract
for manual labour, clerical work or
otherwise) with the exception of those
in the excluded categories as expressly
stated in the extant Minimum Wage law.
Let me add quickly that here in Nigeria,
the concept of minimum wage means
minimum monthly salaries payable to
workers as provided by the subsisting
minimum wage legislation.
Let me also add that here in Nigeria,
minimum wages may also be as determined
in collective agreements, provided
always that if
the organisation to which it
applies has not been excluded from the
scope of the National Minimum Wages Act
such minimum wage shall not be
lower that the national minimum wage in
the extant minimum wage law
Let me also inform that the Extant
Minimum Wage Act provides that an
employer, who fails to pay a worker at
least the national minimum wage rate,
shall be liable to a fine not exceeding
N 100. If the offence continues, the
employer shall be liable to a fine not
exceeding N 10 for each day the offence
continues. In addition to the fine, the
court may order that an employer pay the
outstanding amount that ought to have
been paid to the Worker, had they been
paid the national minimum wage rate.
These penalties have been described
variously as very small and not capable
of discouraging non-compliance[12].
It is also important to note that the
Minimum Wage Act provides that
authorised government official and
labour officers may carry out
inspections of employment premises in
order to determine whether national
minimum wage rates have been paid.
Below is a list of some of the laws
dealing with
wages
in Nigeria.
TABLE 2: WAGE ACTS AND DECREES STILL IN
FORCE IN NIGERIA
|
Name
|
Year
enacted
|
Volume
in LFN 1990
|
Chapter, Decree or Act No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Minimum Wage Act
1981[13]
6
|
Statutory Corporations (Salaries
and Allowances, Etc.) Act
|
1990
|
XXII
|
420
|
|
Wages Boards and Industrial
Councils Act
|
1990
|
XXIV
|
466
|
|
National Minimum Wage Act
|
1990
|
XVI
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Salaries, Incomes and
Wages Commission Decree
|
1993
|
|
99
|
|
National Salaries, Incomes and
Wages Commission (Amendment)
Decree
|
1999
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Minimum Wage Act
(Amendment) Act
|
2000
|
|
1
|
National Minimum Wage Act (Amendment)
Bill
2010[14]
3. THE RIGHT TO MINIMUM WAGE
From the origin of minimum wage as
aforementioned it is not difficult to
see that in the absence of a Minimum
Wage policy some workers will be
subjected to such a terrible low wage
that they may not be able to act like
human beings as their ability to
discharge their duties to their
families, society and even to themselves
would be in serious jeopardy. There is
no gainsaying therefore that workers
have the right to demand that labour be
treated with dignity and the
employer, the society and the
nation have a corresponding duty to
ensure that this right to dignity of
labour and in this particular case the
Right to Minimum Wage is respected.
Anyakwe Nsirimovu[15]
has submitted that
‘more
than any institutional guarantees
respect for human rights must be
inherent in the habits and desires of
the people of the society’.
Anyakwe Nsirimovu[16]
has also argued, and I support his line
of reasoning, that Human Rights are
founded in one single demand, that is,
‘’that
respect is shown for human dignity under
any circumstance’’. In recognition of
this, Section 17 (2) (b) of the 1999
Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria requires that ‘’the
sanctity of the human person shall be
recognised and human dignity shall be
maintained and enhanced’’.
More specifically Section 17 (3) (b) of
the 1999 Constitution of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria requires that
“
the conditions of work are just and
humane.’’.
It is therefore not surprising that the
International labour organization (ILO)
also recognizes the dignity of the human
person and has therefore come up with
ILO Conventions which are labelled core
labour standards based on human rights
especially the respect for the dignity
of labour. These Conventions addresses
workers rights internationally in many
areas including Wages.
The ILO standards in the field of wages
for instance cover four basic aspects:
(I) the protection of wages including
principles and rules concerning the
medium,
Periodicity, time and place of wage
payment, deductions from wages or the
preferential treatment of wage claims in
case of bankruptcy;
(ii) The protection of workers’ claims
in the event of the employer’s
insolvency by means of a privilege or
through a guarantee institution;
(iii) The right to a minimum wage and
the regulation of the operation of wage
fixing Machinery; and, finally
(iv) The protection of socially
acceptable wage rates in public
procurement through the insertion of
labour clauses in public contracts.
The Right to minimum Wage being one of
the basic building blocks of ILO’s
convention on Wages has attracted a lot
of attention.
Even the Ouagadougou[17]
conference on recovery from crises also
observed that
“Minimum wages can protect vulnerable
workers and discourage wage deflation
during the crisis. Existing systems need
to be improved and where they do not
exist, consideration should be given to
their introduction”
Expectedly, the ILO has over the years,
adopted several instruments setting
standards on the principles and methods
of minimum wage regulation. The First of
such Standards was the Minimum
Wage-Fixing Machinery Convention (No.
26) of 1928 (which laid down certain
principles and rules for the application
of minimum wage fixing machinery in
those trades, including manufacturing
and commerce, in which no such mechanism
was available and wages were
exceptionally low). Several other
conventions on minimum wage were later
adopted such as the Wages, Hours of Work
and Manning (Sea) Convention (No. 76),
prescribing the actual amount of an
international minimum wage for seamen
and making provision for the adjustment
of their basic wage and the Social
Policy (Non-Metropolitan Territories)
Convention (No. 82), adopted in 1947,
which set forth the principles and
methods that should be observed in
fixing minimum wages in dependent
territories. There is also the Minimum
Wage Fixing Machinery (Agriculture)
Convention (No. 99) which was adopted in
1951 to address the special problems of
wage policy in agriculture. Later in
1970, The ILO Convention 131 on Minimum
Wage Fixing, which is the principal ILO
Convention on Minimum Wage Fixing, was
adopted.
ILO Convention No. 131 (Minimum Wage
Fixing Convention, 1970) leaves the
determination of the level of minimum
wages that are necessary to protect
“wage earners against unduly low wages”
to the member States themselves. It
nevertheless highlights the potential
trade-offs by emphasizing that the two
key elements to be taken into
consideration are: “the needs of workers
and their families, taking into account
the general level of wages in the
country, the cost of living, social
security benefits, and the relative
living standards of other social
groups”; and “economic factors,
including the requirements of economic
development, levels of productivity and
the desirability of attaining and
maintaining a high level of employment”[18].
It is important for us to summarise at
this stage that
Minimum wage fixing
[19]
is often associated with one or more of
the following four purposes:
(a) Bringing the lowest wages up to the
general level of wages paid for similar
work;
(b) Exerting upward pressure to the
general level of wages as a whole;
(c)
Eliminating unfair competition; and
(d) Serving as a policy tool aimed at
promoting rapid growth and equitable
distribution of the national income.
4. THE NEW MINIMUM WAGE
The last minimum Wage review in Nigeria
was done in 2000 during the
administration of Chief Olusegun
Obasanjo and it appears to be the
practice in our dear country that
minimum wages are reviewed every 10
years. It was therefore not a surprise
when in 2009 the Federal Government put
machinery in motion for the review of
the subsisting Minimum Wage. Let me
however appeal as was similarly appealed
by ILO, that[20]
‘’Minimum wages should be adjusted
regularly to maintain the purchasing
power of affected workers in the face of
price increases, and to avoid large
occasional shocks to the economy. The
welfare of poor workers and households
critically depends on both their wages
and the prices they face. The adjustment
of the nominal minimum wage in the
context of increasing prices is thus as
important as the setting of the initial
rate for a minimum wage. In the current
context of sharply increasing food and
oil prices, and high inflation forecasts
for 2008 and 2009, swift adjustment in
minimum wages is all the more
important.’’
The new minimum wage is therefore the
outcome of rigorous work and
consultations by the tripartite
Presidential Committee on National
Minimum Wage, headed by retired Chief
Justice of Nigeria, Hon Justice S M A
Belgore, GCON. The committee was
inaugurated by late President Umaru Musa
Yar'adua, represented by the Secretary
to the Government of the Federation
Alhaji Mahmud Yayale Ahmed on July 14th
2009, to review the national minimum
wage as well as the Act establishing it.
The committee is made up of eight
members each from organised labour,
organised private sector and the
government. The government was
represented by four ministers and the
Head of Service of the Federation on a
representative basis, as well as three
members from the states representing
different geo-political zones. The
organised private sector representation
includes the Nigeria Employers
Consultative Association (NECA), NACCIMA
and NASME while the organised labour,
was represented by NLC and TUC. The
committee examined the relevant economic
indices offered by Ministry of Finance,
Nigeria Institute for Social and
Economic Research (NISER), CBN, relevant
laws and conventions of the
International Labour Organisation (ILO).
According to Justice Belgore[21]:
“The committee met severally and
consulted widely. It further took
cognisance of the need to ensure that
the outcome of the exercise must be
growth-propelled in terms of GDP growth
rate. …It also considered its capability
of promoting rapid socio-economic
transformation of the country, which
will not lead to inflation spiral…The
objective is aimed at alleviating
poverty in the country as well as
maintaining macro-economic stability.”
Consequently and based upon the
negotiation of the stakeholders, the
Justice Alfa Belgore committee proposed
the following inter alia, which were
forwarded to the Secretary of the
Government of the Federation by the
chairman of the committee at a widely
reported ceremony on the 1st of
July 2010:
-
A national minimum wage of N18, 000
per month for all establishments in
the public and private sectors
employing 50 workers and above.
-
An
upward review of the sanctions that
would serve as a deterrent to
would-be violators of the new
national minimum wage. The committee
recommended that Section 8 of the
Principal Act, which prescribes a
fine not exceeding N500 or
imprisonment for a term not
exceeding three months or both,
should be amended to ”a fine not
exceeding N100,000 or to
imprisonment for a term not
exceeding six months or both such
fine and imprisonment.” It also
recommended the amendment of section
3 of the Principal Act, which
prescribes “a fine not exceeding
N100 and in the case of a continuing
offence a fine not exceeding N10 for
each day during which the offence
continues,” to read instead,” a fine
not exceeding N50, 000 and in the
case of continuing offence to a fine
not exceeding N10, 000 for each day
during which the offence continues.”
-
A more frequent review period, not
exceeding five years, to be carried
out by a statutory tripartite
committee that would be appointed
from time to time by the president.
-
That the extant National Minimum
Wage Act 1981 and its subsequent
amendments of 1990 and 2000 should
be repealed, and replaced with a new
Act to be enacted.
It is very important to note that the
Justice Belgore Committee Report was
accompanied by a draft new National
Minimum Wage Bill of 2010 for onward
transmission to the National Assembly.
Let me comment that the Justice Alfa
Belgore-led committee recommendation
that the new wage should apply to
organisations with 50 employees and
above, and exclude seasonal employment
such as in agriculture, workers on
part-time basis and allied employment is
understandable as
the issue of the organizations to which
minimum wage should apply in Nigeria has
been a contentious one as it is linked
to its practical effectiveness. For
instance, it would be recalled that in
1987 a,
‘’ controversial decision was taken in
February, when the government announced
a major relaxation of the nation's
minimum wage laws. Under new
regulations, all companies with fewer
than 500 employees would be exempted
from minimum wage requirements;
previously, only companies with fewer
than 50 employees had been exempt. After
concerted and vociferous protests from
labour unions and indications of
widespread abuse by employers, however,
the government reversed its stance and
reinstituted the original provision.’’[22]
Also commenting on the effectiveness of
the proposed enforcement mechanism
inbuilt in the new minimum wage Comrade
Peter Esele , President-General , Trade
Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC)
and a member of the Tripartite
Committee on National Minimum Wage[23]
stated that:
“For the first time, we want to make it
a law that any minimum wage decided at
the federal level will be binding for
every employer of labour in Nigeria. We
want to make a law so that we can use it
in holding erring states, companies and
establishments liable for defaulting to
pay.” -
Let me also observe that although the
new national minimum wage of N18, 000
per month
represent an increase of 327% of
the 2000 National Minimum Wage (in
nominal terms), it is less than 35% of
the N52000 demanded by organized labour
and
just some 80% of
the US$ equivalent of the 1981
National Minimum Wage. The US$
equivalent of the 1981 minimum wage
which is US$150 when converted into
Naira at today’s exchange rate is
N22500.
Also commenting on the extant
minimum wage, Comrade Issa Aremu noted
that
[24]
“We are legitimately pained with the
stories of millions of Naira allegedly
paid to the legislators monthly. Yet
nobody seems worried nor alarmed that
the subsisting prevailing minimum wage
Act passed in 2000 offers a worker just
a peanut minimum wage of N5,500 month.
At the exchange rate of N150 to a
dollar, a Nigerian worker earns less
than $40 a month now, which in real
terms is less than the N125 ($150) a
Nigerian worker earned as minimum wage
in 1981.”
The peaceful manner in which the
negotiation was done and concluded is
commendable and also shows the
understanding and patience of the
parties especially the workers. This
should be reciprocated by government and
the employers by implementing it
immediately notwithstanding that fact
that Assembly is in the process of
amending the National Minimum Wage Act
2000, to give legal backing to the
committee’s recommendations.
5. ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
Let us not pretend that there are no
challenges that would affect the
management and implementation of the New
National Minimum Wage in Nigeria. The
fact is that there are great challenges
ahead and it is important we identify
these challenges and collectively
proffer solutions to them.
5.1 LEGAL:
As mentioned above, legally speaking the
new wage is not enforceable until the
Nigerian National Assembly amends the
National Minimum Wage Act 2000. It is
therefore important that the Executive
arm of Government fast track the
submission and passage of an amendment
to the 2000 National Minimum Wage Act to
give effect to the consensus reached by
the Justice Alfa Belgore Tripartite
minimum wage negotiating committee,
especially since the committee report
was accompanied by a draft new National
Minimum Wage Bill of 2010 for onward
transmission to the National Assembly.
Moreover negotiation process that led to
the new N18,000 was all inclusive as all
the key stakeholders including the
States and Private sector were involved
and represented. Commenting on the delay
in the passage of the 2010 Minimum Wage
Bill into Law, Comrade Issa Aremu
[25]notes
that:
“With respect to the new minimum wage,
the federal government must show the
same will power that made speedy
appropriation of supplementary budget of
N87 billion for INEC possible and make
provision for the new negotiated rate
possible in 2011 budget for the public
sector workers. Also, the government
must direct the private sector employers
to negotiate with their workers, with a
view of implementing the new minimum
wage. The real governance issue today,
after the electoral reform, is crisis of
compensation engendered by the existing
miserable pay of the working people.”
This seeming
silence and delay is worrisome and
generating some uneasy atmosphere
in the Labour Circle
especially
considering that a bill proposing a
minimum wage of N30,000 in reaction to
workers’ lamentations passed second
reading in the House of Representatives
in July 2009 ,the
Justice Belgore committee report
was accompanied by a draft new National
Minimum Wage Bill of 2010 for onward
transmission to the National Assembly
and the N18000 new minimum wage is a
negotiated outcome involving all the key
stakeholders.
5.2 LABOUR MARKET SITUATION:
The labour market situation in Nigeria
is such that there are too many people
chasing too few jobs. The level of
unemployment and poverty in Nigeria
today is unprecedented. It is so serious
that Nigerians are seriously worried
by the huge and unprecedented job
losses occasioned by (a)The Global
economic meltdown (b)The relocation of
companies from Niger Delta to other
regions
because of the Niger Delta
security crises (c)The relocation of
companies from Nigeria to neighbouring
countries because of the hydra headed
power sector problems , the prevalent
multiple taxation
, security challenges,
corruption, terrible conditions of basic
infrastructure , the unacceptable high
cost of doing business in Nigeria
worsened by the
clear manifestation of the
so-called voracity effect(i.e. the
absence of
strong institutions and the
prevalence of
multiple powerful groups and
strong men struggling for their share of
the so-called national cake at the
expense of the much needed Nigeria’s
economic development ) and
Dutch disease (i.e.
the obvious relationship between
the increase in exploitation of natural
resources and a decline in the
manufacturing sector ) (d) Reforms in
the banking , petroleum, public sectors
etc
worsened by the irrational and
inhuman responses to these reforms by
some employers of labour. Under this
circumstance the capacity of the
Nigerian worker to demand the new
Minimum wage is greatly impaired.
5.3 UNFRIENDLY POSTURE OF SOME STATE
GOVERNORS ON MINIMUM WAGE
It is no longer news that some state
governors have voiced their
unwillingness to pay the new minimum
wage. This is not new. For instance when
the 2000 minimum wage was announced many
state governments refused to pay the
Federal government recommended minimum
wage leading to many industrial actions.
As a recap of what happened in 2000,
permit me to present the report of the
International Committee of the Fourth
International (ICFI) on the strikes by
labour and actions of State Governors in
2000[26]:
“Nigeria has been gripped by a strike
wave over the level at which a new
minimum wage should be set. The action
began two weeks ago with a strike by
civil servants in Lagos state, and
quickly spread throughout the country.
Forty-seven thousand public sector
workers have been on strike for two
weeks in Lagos, with refuse dumps not
cleared, water taps running dry and
health services collapsing. Civil
servants in at least 12 states,
including Anambra, Abia and Ondo, began
indefinite strikes this week. The
dispute has been joined by other
sections of workers, including those in
the textile and clothing industry.
Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo has
been in talks with government officials.
On Monday, the governors of the
country's 36 states said they would only
agree to 5,500 naira ($55) a month as
the level for the minimum wage. Workers
are demanding between N6,500 and N7,500.
The minimum wage has a long tradition in
Nigeria. Even the last military
dictatorship of General Abdulsalami
Abubakar had a minimum wage of N3,000. …
Emboldened by the lack of an effective
response, some governors are now
threatening redundancies to pay for
salary increases. Speaking last Thursday
after abortive talks to resolve the
eight-day strike, Lagos governor Bola
Tinubu said his administration was now
considering staff rationalisation as a
way out of the wages crisis.”
The utterances and comments of some
state governors since the Justice Alfa
Belgore Committee submitted their report
on the new Minimum Wage of N18, 000 is
not substantially different from
what we heard in 2000 and is to
say the least worrisome. For instance it
was reported that the Ogun State
Governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, has
hinted that his state cannot pay the
new
minimum wage as it is presently burdened
with N2.2 billion workers salary
monthly. According to a report, Governor
Gbenga Daniel said that:
“The newly approved minimum wage of
N18,000 recently approved by the federal
government has not even appeared on our
expenditure screen. Let me, however, say
this, no matter how palatable it may be,
Ogun State, under the economic crunch it
is presently experiencing, will not be
in any position, to implement any of
this increment, except a financial
miracle occurs soon,”[27]
Governor Gbenga Daniel also declared
that:
“the only adjustment the state could
accommodate would be a reduction in the
salaries of the state's 44,500
workforce, adding that state has been
battling with the agitation of various
labour unions in the state over sundry
increment in their emoluments….According
to the governor, the state might be
forced, with the approval of the
stakeholders to embark on massive load
shedding of its workforce”[28]
This kind of comments coming from some
State Governors
is
very disturbing especially when we
consider that the State governments were
consulted and represented in the Justice
Alfa Belgore Tripartite Committee on
National Minimum Wage Committee and the
different state governments made
recommendations on what should be the
new national wage, with Abia State
providing the highest proposal of
N46,700 while Plateau and Ebonyi states
made the lowest recommendation of
N10,000. Others and their proposals are
as follows: Bauchi, N16,585.50; FCT,
N25,000; Kwara N30,000; Imo, N30,000;
Zamfara, N15,000; Jigawa, N20,800; Abia,
N46,700; Plateau, N10,000; Kebbi,
N30,000; Anambra, N25,000; Ebonyi,
N10,000; Akwa Ibom, N13,333.12; and Kano
N11,022.17.[29]
Already, following these unfriendly
comments by some Governors, the
organised labour is spoiling for war.
For instance the
“Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC)
on Monday threatened to paralyse
business activities in the country if
state governments fail to ensure
immediate implementation of the N18, 000
national minimum wage. The congress also
called on President Goodluck Jonathan
and the National Assembly to immediately
“take all necessary actions to improve
workers’ wellbeing through a new wage
structure that will affect every
worker.” Peter Esele, TUC
president-general, and John Kolawole,
TUC secretary-general gave the threat in
a statement issued on Monday. …While
expressing concern over the disagreement
arising from non-implementation of the
national minimum wage by some state
governments, Esele and Kolawole urged
all the states to desist from any action
capable of truncating existing
industrial harmony in the country. They
said: “Such comments as insensitive,
selfish and without regards to the
workers who are under paid despite their
wealth of experience and contributions
towards national development, as against
their political appointees’ counterparts
who by the end of the month go home with
huge salaries and other entitlements.”[30]
From the forgoing, it is evident that
there is an
urgent
and immediate need for the Federal
Government of Nigeria to convene a
meeting of social partners such as the
Nigerian Labour Congress(NLC), Trade
Union Congress of Nigeria(TUC) ,Nigerian
Employers Consultative Association
(NECA) and the Governors’ Forum to agree
on broad guidelines for the
implementation of the new wage in the
various sectors of the economy and three
tiers of the government .
This in my view could
facilitate
the speedy and peaceful passage of the
Report Justice Belgore Tripartite
Committee on National Minimum Wage into
law by the National Assembly.
Already President Goodluck Ebele
Jonathan GCFR in his Facebook page has
assured that:
“While I cannot dictate to the state
governments or the private sector, I
will do everything within my powers to
encourage and cooperate with the states
to do what is right for Nigerian workers
because in the final analysis we are
first and foremost citizens of Nigeria
before our indigeneship of a given
state. As for the private sector, they
can even pay more so long as our vision
of growing the economy in partnership
with them remains on course. I am very
hopeful.”[31]
It is our hope that Our President would
do everything within his power to ensure
a seamless implementation of the new
minimum wage across all sectors and all
tiers of government as this would save
the country from the wave of industrial
actions similar (if not greater than) to
the ones that heralded the faulty
implementation of the 2000 Minimum Wage.
Let me state that unlike
the 2000 wave of strike action,
any of such industrial actions now would
further heat up the already overheated
polity due to the issues around the 2011
general elections. Already the
Association of Senior Civil Servants of
Nigeria (an affiliate of TUC) has given
indication that they may not participate
in the 50th Independence
anniversary if the new wage is not paid.
It is therefore in the interest of all
parties to ensure that issues and
concerns over the implementation of the
new minimum wage are proactively
resolved.
5.4 NON-UNIONISED WORKERS, CASUALISATION
AND CONTRACT STAFF:
Non-unionised workers as experience has
shown are the greatest victims of unfair
labour practices including the denial of
their rights as contained in the extant
labour laws and the ILO conventions.
Empirical evidence confirms that the
respect for workers’ right and dignity
are very much likely to be violated for
non-unionised workers, casual workers
and
contract staff. This is quite
understandable and that is why the
constitution, extant labour laws,
African Charter on Human and People
Rights(Ratification and Enforcement Act)
1990 as well as various ILO conventions
seeks to guarantee the right of workers
to join a trade union for their
protection.
Please kindly permit me to use this
opportunity to remind us that it is
unlawful for an employment contract to
require or to restrain an employee from
joining a Trade Union. In the same
fashion, employees’ contracts cannot be
extinguished by reason of the employee
joining a Trade Union. All workers,
whether they are permanent staff, agency
or contract staff of any category, have
the right to join a trade union and
bargain collectively. This is a
constitutional right as well as a right
under the ILO Convention.
Trade unions must intensify their
efforts at unionizing the workers as a
minimum. They must however go beyond
that and continue to display courage and
solidarity in the protection of the
rights and welfare of their members and
in the mobilisation of Nigerians against
unpopular/obnoxious government
policies/programmes. This is their
sacred duty and divine calling and is
the basis upon which they will be judged
by humanity. No amount of fear, evil and
oppression can kill the will and
determination of any people in their
pursuit for social justice and a fair
society; except if the people themselves
are not determined and united in their
struggle. Let me also say
that
No society has made any fundamental
progress without the sacrifice of great
men and women who refused to take the
easy part of pretending to be
neutral
in the midst of evil
but
rather chose to fight evil , injustice,
corruption and oppression head-on.
History is replete with so many examples
and even
Nigeria’s political independence
would not have taken place in 1960
without the sacrifice of
Nigerian workers who were
massacred at Iva Valley Coal mines,
bulleted at Burutu, bludgeoned and
buffeted in many other parts of the
country as they fought for the
untrammelled freedom and prosperity of
their fatherland. I also want to say
that without the exemplary leadership
and
unparalled tenacity of purpose of
Chief Milton Dabibi( Former Secretary
General of TUC
and former General Secretary of
PENGASSAN , Chief Frank Kokori (former
General Secretary of NUPENG)and many
other great union leaders in the
face of intimidating
circumstances and unrestrained
exhibition of awesome instruments of
terror
during the dark days of Military
dictatorship
the present democracy may not
have come when it came, or might even
have eluded us! These great leaders have
played their own roles and very well. It
is the duty of the current Trade Union
leaders to ensure that Nigeria is
liberated from the shackles of
corruption, deceit, electoral fraud,
social injustice, outright brigandage
and voracity effects. We cannot close
our eyes to the unprecedented level of
suffering, pain and injustice in Nigeria
occasioned largely due the bondage
imposed on our country men and women
through the instrumentality of
corruption, deceit, electoral fraud,
social injustice, outright brigandage
and voracity effects[32].
5.5 ENFORCEMENT CAPACITY OF THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES:
There are doubts in some quarters as to
whether the Federal Government has
sufficient qualified personnel for the
purpose of ensuring that the provisions
of the labour laws including the
National Minimum Wage are effectively
and adequately observed by employers of
labour including the various state and
local governments. Even the
International Labour Organisation (ILO)
seem to be of this view going by their
observations that
‘’unfortunately, in many countries,
labour inspection services are
understaffed and penalties are too weak.
As a result, minimum wages too often
remain a “paper tiger” rather than an
effective policy.’’[33]
A very close examination of the number
of officers working in the Federal
Ministry of Labour and Productivity in
say Port Harcourt vis-à-vis the level of
industrial activities in Rivers State
tend to support this line of thinking.
As observed by Squire and
Suthiwart-Narueput (1997)
[34]
‘’It is well appreciated that compliance
is a function of the probability of
firms being visited by labour inspection
services, and of the level of penalties
in the case of non-compliance’’.
There is therefore no gainsaying that
supervision by the Ministry is very
important so as to ensure that the
Minimum Wage is actually implemented in
practice.
5.6 LACK OF AWARENESS OF THE NEW MINIMUM
WAGE
If workers and indeed Nigerians do not
know the new Minimum wage and the
provisions of the Principal Act
including the2010 amendments, they would
not be able to demand for them.
It
is therefore important that adequate
enlightenment campaign is carried out by
Government, the Organised Labour and
other social partners and stakeholders
to sensitise the Nigerian public and
workers. To this end, let me once again;
on behalf of the Rivers State Council of
the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria
(TUC) and all our affiliate-unions thank
the Chartered institute of personnel
management of Nigeria(CIPMN) for putting
this event together and for providing
for an opportunity for the participants
to talk about the new Minimum Wage.
5.6 ORGANISATIONS WITH A CULTURE OF
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE AND MISERABLE
WAGES
It is very sad to say that there are
some organisations that have a culture
of unfair labour practices and it would
seem that they try to exploit every
available opportunity to oppress,
repress and enslave their workers.
I do not need any soothsayer for me to
know that such organisations would do
everything possible to evade the new
minimum wage. Some of them may even
begin to convert their employees (if
they have not already done so by now) to
“contract staff” to surrogate employers
such that none of these employers would
have up to 50 employees since the
minimum wage applies to companies with
at least 50 employees. They would then
turn around and say that the workers are
not their employees and that even their
‘employers’ have informed them that they
have less than 50 workers and hence the
minimum wage does not apply to them.
Let me point it out clearly that the
organised labour would not accept any
such unfair labour practices and would
vehemently oppose it.
For the purpose of minimum wage
implementation, all workers working in
the company/organisation irrespective of
their classification or nature of
contract would be considered.
6.
SUGGESTIONS FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF
THE NEW MINIMUM WAGE
In addition to some of the suggestions
made in the various sections of the
paper, I would attempt to make some
suggestions for the effective
implementation/management of the new
national minimum wage. I have also come
here to learn and so would respectfully
appeal to each and every one of us to
come up with useful suggestions on the
way forward.
6.1 SOCIAL DIALOGUE AND CONSULTATIVE
MEETINGS AMONG STAKEHOLDERS
The importance of social dialogue and
consultation among the stakeholders
in the effective management of
the new minimum wage cannot be over
emphasised.
This has also been confirmed by the ILO
in her Update on minimum wage
developments where it was observed that:
“The active involvement of social
partners in both the design and
operation of minimum wage enforcement
regimes is essential to enhance their
impact. Recently, in the United Kingdom,
in the face of growing problems of
underpayment of minimum wages, the
Government organized consultative
meetings with interested parties to
discuss the suitability and implications
of suggested changes to the minimum wage
enforcement regime. Both workers’ and
employers’ organizations put forward a
number of constructive proposals. In the
United States, the US Government
Accounting Office (GAO) recommended to
the Department of Labour to involve
employers’ and workers’ organizations in
planning their enforcement activities so
as to counter the decline in the number
of actions to enforce the Fair Labour
Standards Act between 1997 and 2007.”[35]
Based on the forgoing, I would humbly
and respectfully appeal that we in
Nigeria apply international best
practices on similar issues which as we
have seen above include effective
dialogue and consultation by the
stakeholders for the purpose of
achieving a seamless implementation and
better management of the new minimum in
the interest of industrial peace and
harmony, and our post-recession economy.
I am very glad that this was also the
view of the Justice
Alfa Belgore Tripartite committee on
National Minimum wage when they
suggested that:
“In order to forestall any possible
industrial crises that might arise as a
result of the new national minimum wage,
the Federal Government through the
Federal Ministry of Labour and
Productivity as a matter of expediency
convene a meeting of the social partners
(NLC, TUC and NECA) to agree on the
broad guidelines for the implementation
of the new national minimum wage in the
various sectors of the economy including
the public service”[36].
6.2 PROPER ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS TO
DISCOURAGE NON-COMPLIANCE
Without adequate mechanism for its
enforcement , the new Minimum wages
would just end up as a mere paper work
,without any practical use.
Therefore, the minimum wage should be
accompanied by credible enforcement
mechanisms which should have proper
legal backing. Evidence from a number of
country studies suggests that
non-compliance can be extremely high,
especially in countries where the
sanctions for non compliance are
minimal. Table 3 below provide examples
of sanctions imposed by some countries.
Table 3 Examples of sanctions (in
addition to the payment of salaries due)[37]:
|
China 1 to 5 times the amount
owed to the worker
|
|
France EUR 1,524 8 (US$1,270.70
– about 1.5 the monthly minimum
wage) times the number of
affected workers
|
|
Mexico Between 50 and 200 times
the minimum wage
|
|
Mozambique Up to 10 times the
minimum wage times the number of
affected workers
|
|
Seventy five per cent of
countries stipulate fines for
non-compliance ranging from
one-fourth to 200 times the
minimum wage.
|
|
Fifteen per cent of countries
provide for fines and/or
imprisonment (from six days to
four years).
|
|
For 10% of countries, no
provision could be identified
|
Based on the above, and the history of
non-compliance in Nigeria, the Trade
Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) support
the recommendation of the Justice
Belgore led Tripartite Committee on new
national minimum wage calling for
effective sanctions against erring
states and organization.
For instance the committee recommended
that Section 8 of the Principal Act
(1981 National Minimum Wage Act), which
prescribes a fine not exceeding N500 or
imprisonment for a term not exceeding
three months or both, should be amended
to”
a fine not exceeding N100, 000 or to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding
six months or both such fine and
imprisonment.” The committee also
recommended for the amendment of Section
3 of the Principal Act which prescribes
“a fine not exceeding N100 and in the
case of a continuing offence a fine not
exceeding N10 for each day during which
the offence continues,” to read
instead,” a fine not exceeding N50, 000
and in the case of continuing offence to
a fine not exceeding N10, 000 for each
day during which the offence continues.”
These in our view will discourage non
compliance by organizations and have our
total support.
6.3
LEGAL BACKING
As was shown in Section 5.1 of this
paper, without giving legal backing to
the new minimum wage, it will end up as
a mere recommendation which is subject
to the acceptance or otherwise of the
parties.
This therefore underscores the urgent
need for the National Assembly to
quickly pass into law the
recommendations of the Justice Belgore
Tripartite Committee on National Minimum
Wage to give it the force of law. It is
also important that the law should be
simple so that it would be easily
understood by all stakeholders (i.e.
employers, employees, labour unions
,employers union and the enforcement
institutions) as well as include
procedures that will help workers and
their Union Officials to effectively
exercise their rights under the minimum
wage legislation, including the right to
recover amounts by which they may have
been underpaid; and adequate protection
of workers against victimization for
doing so.
6.4
ADEQUATE PUBLICITY OF THE NEW MINIMUM
WAGE
There must be adequate arrangements to
give proper publicity to the new minimum
wage provisions as well as the
provisions of the minimum wage law in
languages or dialects understood by
workers including illiterate persons.
The importance of publicity and mass
enlightenment of the new minimum wage
cannot be overemphasised.
6.5
EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE MONITORING
It is very important for the Federal
Government to adequately staff their
various agencies charged with
responsibilities of monitoring
compliance with the new minimum wage as
well as provide them with adequate
facilities necessary to carry out their
duties.
The organised labour (i.e. the Nigeria
Labour Congress and the Trade Union
Congress) should also inaugurate their
working committees for the monitoring
and enforcement of the new Minimum wage
across the country. The NLC and TUC
monitoring committees when formed should
ensure that they work in close
partnership with organised private
sector and NECA. They should also ensure
that they work closely with the various
state governments to ensure that the new
minimum wage is seamlessly implemented.
7. CONCLUSION
Let me by way of conclusion state that
the effective management and
implementation of the new minimum wage
require the efforts, commitment and
collaboration of all stakeholders. Let
me also appeal that we ensure that our
comments and suggestions on the
effective implementation and management
of the new minimum wage receive the
attention of the policy makers.
Finally, let me thank you for your kind
attention. May God Almighty bless us and
help us to do His will on earth!
Solidarity forever!
Comrade Hyginus Chika Onuegbu
JP,FCA,ACTI[38]
[1]
‘’Update on minimum wage
developments’’
ILO Committee on
Employment and Social Policy
Geneva, March 2009 page
9
[2]
‘’Minimum Wage’’. Wikipedia
[3]
ILO 2006: Minimum wages policy
.Page 1
[4]
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009.
[5].ILC,
79th Session, 1992, Report III
(Part 4B), para. 42, p. 13
[6]
Report of the Meeting of Experts
on Minimum Wage Fixing and
Related Problems, with Special
Reference to Developing
Countries, 1967, GB.170, para.
100, pp. 20-21.
[7]
General Survey of the reports on
the Minimum Wage fixing
Machinery Convention (No. 26),
and Recommendation (No. 30),
1928; the Minimum Wage Fixing
Machinery (Agriculture)
Convention (No. 99), and
Recommendation (No. 89), 1951;
and the Minimum Wage Fixing
Convention (No. 131), and
Recommendation (No. 135), 1970,
ILC, 79th Session, 1992, Report
III (Part 4B), paras. 32-33, p.
10.
[8]
‘’Minimum Wage’’ .Microsoft ®
Encarta ® 2009.
[9]
M. Dollé: Le salaire minimum en
France: que nous apprennent les
expériences étrangères?,
in Droit social, Jun. 1999, pp.
547-552 and D. Metcalf:
The
British national minimum wage,
in British Journal of Industrial
Relations, Vol. 37, 1999, pp.
171-201.
[10]
ILO: Global Wage Report 2008/09
(Geneva, 2008), p. 35.
[11]
Please take note that the
detailed discussion on each of
these committees/panel listed in
the table is beyond the scope of
this paper.
[12]
The penalties in the extant
Minimum Wage Laws in Nigeria is
very small and is one of the
areas identified for review by
the Justice Alfa Belgore
Tripartite National Committee on
Minimum Wage. The 2010
proposed minimum wage
amendment bill prescribes
greater penalties including
imprisonment for defaulters.
[13]
National Minimum Wage Act, of
1981 (Official Gazette, 1981,
A53-57) is the Principal Act on
Minimum Wage in Nigeria.
[14]
The 2000 amendment is expected
to be further amended in 2010 in
view of the new minimum wage and
other recommendations by the
Justice Alfa Belgore Committee.
[15]
Anyakwe Nsirimovu (1997) Human
Rights: An Umbilical Cord of
Participatory Democracy.
Institute Of Human Rights And
Humanitarian Law page 14
[16]
Anyakwe Nsirimovu (1997) Human
Rights: An Umbilical Cord of
Participatory Democracy.
Institute Of Human Rights And
Humanitarian Law page 21
[17]
Recovering from the Crisis: A
Roadmap for the Implementation
of the Global Jobs Pact in
Africa:
Ouagadougou Conference
Page 8
[18]
ILO Convention No. 131 (Minimum
Wage Fixing Convention, 1970)
[19]
ILO,
Minimum wage fixing and economic
development,
1968, pp. 5-12.
[20]
ILO.’’Global Wage Report
2008 / 09’’ page 43
[21]
“Nigeria: Minimum Wage - Belgore
Committee Recommends N18,000”.
Leadership. 12 July 2010
[22]
‘’1987:
Nigeria’’.Microsoft
® Encarta ® 2009
[23]
‘’New Minimum Wage: Would State,
Private Sector Workers Also Have
A Piece Of The Cake?’’ Saturday
Tribune, Saturday, 24 July 2010
[24]
Comrade Issa Aremu
“Nigeria: Minimum Wage, Minimum
Delay”.
Daily Trust August 29
2010.
[25]
Comrade Issa Aremu “Nigeria:
Minimum Wage, Minimum Delay”.
Daily Trust
August 29 2010.
[26]
“Nigeria in midst of strike
wave”. International Committee
of the Fourth International
(ICFI). 6 July 2000
[27]
“New minimum wage: NLC moves to
compel states, private sector to
pay”. Sunday Trust. SUNDAY, 18
JULY 2010
[28]
“No New Minimum Wage for Our
Workers - Governor Daniel”.
Leadership. July 14 2010
[29]
“Minimum wage violators risk
six-month jail term”. The Punch.
July 13th 2010.
[30]
“TUC threatens showdown with
states”.
www.tucnigeria.org. Also see
“Minimum wage: TUC threatens
showdown with states” .Businessday
of August 10 2010
[31]
“Minimum wage violators risk
six-month jail term”. The Punch.
Tuesday, 13 Jul 2010
[32]
Voracity Effect is the absence
of strong institutions and the
prevalence of multiple powerful
groups and strong men struggling
for their share of the so-called
national cake at the expense of
the much needed Nigeria’s
economic development. The term
was made popular by Aaron
Tornell and Philip R. Lane in
their various studies on
economic growth and quality of
the institutions of governance
in developing countries. Their
studies were conducted in
view of the two common
disturbing characteristics of
developing countries that have
grown slowly in the last several
decades
namely -the absence of
strong legal and political
institutions and the presence of
multiple powerful groups in
society. The authors analysed a
dynamic model of economic growth
process to answer the following
three questions. First, why does
the combination of a weak
institutional structure and
fractionalization inside the
governing elite generate slow
growth? Second, what is the
relationship between the
concentration of power (the
number of powerful groups) and
growth? Third, why do such
countries not only grow slowly
but also frequently respond in a
perverse fashion to favorable
shocks, by increasing more than
proportionally fiscal
redistribution and investing in
'inefficient capital projects?.
Their result was made popular in
their paper titled ‘Voracity
Effect’ The American Economic
Review Vol. 89, No. 1 (Mar.,
1999), pp. 22-46. They observed
that such Powerful groups
dynamically interact via a
fiscal process that effectively
allows open access to the
aggregate capital stock. In
equilibrium, this leads to slow
economic growth and a "voracity
effect," by which a shock, such
as a terms of trade windfall,
perversely generates a
more-than-proportionate increase
in fiscal redistribution and
reduces growth. They also showed
that a dilution in the
concentration of power leads to
faster growth and a less
procyclical response to shocks.
You can also see
Aaron Tornell and Philip
R. Lane June 1996 “Power,
growth, and the voracity effect”
Journal of Economic Growth
Volume 1, Number 2,
[33]
ILO.
‘’Global Wage Report 2008 /
09’’. Page 52
[34]
Squire, L.; Suthiwart-Narueput,
S. 1997. “The impact of labor
market regulations”, in The
World Bank Economic Review, Vol.
11, No. 1, pp. 119–144
[35]
‘’Update on minimum wage
developments’’
ILO Committee on
Employment and Social Policy
Geneva, March 2009 page
page
9
[36]
‘’Pay N18,000 minimum wage or go
to jail’’. The
Vanguard. Jul 12, 2010
[37]
ILO 2006: Minimum wages policy
.Page 3
[38]
Comrade Hyginus Chika Onuegbu
is the Rivers State
Chairman of the Trade Union
Congress of Nigeria (TUC). He is
also a member of the
International Labour and
Employment Relations
Association(ILERA) with
headquarters in Geneva, a Fellow
of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN),
an Associate of the Chartered
Institute of Taxation of
Nigeria(CITN) and holds an M.Sc
Economics Degree from the
University of Calabar . He was
appointed a Justice of the Peace
(JP) by the Rivers State
Government in September 2010.He
can be reached at the Rivers
State Secretariat of the Trade
Union Congress of Nigeria (MBM
Plaza, 48 Old Aba Road, By Shell
I.A. Maingate, Rumuobiakani, PHC
or
08037404222/riverstuc@yahoo.com/chikaonuegbu@yahoo.com.
For more information on TUC
Nigeria, please visit our
website
www.tucnigeria.org
|