|
The attention of the Forum has been drawn to
a news report on the front page of Thisday
newspaper of Wednesday, November 24, 2010
titled, Revealed: Atiku
Defeated
IBB by Just One Vote! A similar story was
carried by other newspapers claiming to know
the pattern of voting in the Forum's
Consensus Committee which selected Atiku
Abubakar at the conclusion of its assignment
on Monday, November
22,
2010.
The authors of Thisday's report, Imam Imam,
Chuks Okocha, Onyebuchi Ezigbo and John
Shilam who wrote from Lagos, Abuja and
Kaduna respectively, claimed to have known
which members of the Consensus Committee
voted for which candidates using evasive
attributions such as "Thisday can report",
"It has also emerged" etc. The Forum would
have totally ignored the report if the paper
did not also attribute its story to "a
source, who witnessed the vote."
For the avoidance of doubt, the NPLF
Consensus Committee has finished its job and
does not wish to be drawn into unnecessary
controversy with paid agents of the State
who thrive on patronage from any government
in power. But the reference to "a source who
witnessed the vote" has made this rejoinder
necessary. Unknown to the peddlers of this
false report I, Bello Sabo Abdulkadir,
Secretary to the Consensus Committee was the
only person present, who was not a member of
the Committee, when the voting to choose the
consensus candidate took place. Yet, even I
have no idea which member of the Committee
voted for which candidate simply because the
voting was by secret ballot and no member
volunteered any information to that effect.
But the report in question fail all known
tenets of responsible journalism in the
sense that none of the reporters mentioned
above spoke to me or to any member of the
Consensus Committee. As a matter of fact
each of the members of the Committee has
assured me that they have never met with any
of the reporters nor spoken to any reporter
since the conclusion of the process. How
then did the reporters come about their vote
count, not to talk of matching votes and
voters to specific candidates? The report
is, to say the least, highly irresponsible
and regrettable.
I would like to seize this opportunity to
apologize to all whose hard earned
reputation this report seeks to tarnish,
especially the aspirants who submitted
themselves to the Consensus process. We all
know the rotten depth to which the
profession of journalism has descended
whereby anyone with money can buy a story no
matter how implausible or how absurd. We
also know the identity of those who seek to
benefit from this kind of reportage. They
should know that those who live by the sword
are bound to die by it.
Bello Sabo Abdulkadir
|