|
Candidates' Lists :INEC makes
U-turn, drops Akala, Chime
Newsdiaryonline Wed Feb
9,2011
The Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC ) has
revealed more shocking twist
to the unfolding lists of
candidates eligible to contest
the 2011 elections.The
Commission on Tuesday said that
the
inclusion of Governors
Adebayo Alao Akala and Sullivan
Chime of Enugu State on the
candidates' lists being
displayed was an error.
INEC’s National Commissioner in
charge of Legal Services, Philip
Umeadi Jnr while
speaking with
journalists at INEC national
headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday
night,
delivered a bombshell when he
said
that it was erroneous
for INEC to endorse the
nominations of the two governors
because they were subject of
litigations.
According to Umeadi, the error
occurred because the judgement
against Governor Chime came
late.
" By the time the judgment was
served on us, we had received
the nomination list for Enugu
State. Ideally, in deference to
that judgment, we ought not to
have published it, so that
publication was an error and
that was why it was removed.
Umeadi Jr
said further that the
court order was served on INEC
at about January 31 while INEC
had received the candidates’
list from the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP) on January 21, 2011,
through
a letter dated January
17, 2011.
He added that a similar error
occurred with respect to the
case of Akala of Oyo state.
"Again the same thing happened
in Oyo State where there was
also a judgment with respect to
Oyo. That again, was published
in error.
“We had so many judgments (court
orders) and I tried to explain
the rationale behind the
on-going exercise, when I spoke
recently. The Form 001 and CF002
are merely forms which
candidates the political parties
intend to sponsor for the
election submitted to INEC.
"We have now taken these forms
to their constituencies,
published them in the
constituencies for the
constituents to know the
particular candidates to raise
objections with respect to their
qualifications for the
respective offices, which they
intend to contest."
More petitions and court orders
are flooding his office and that
of the INEC chairman,he said.
Umeadi Jr said further that
INEC expects
that after the
publication of candidates’ lists
and their particulars in
compliance with the law, those
aggrieved
can now go to court in
line with their democratic
rights.
Under the Electoral Act, people
who may file
petitions to INEC
include those
who have been unjustly
substituted; those who won
primaries and their names were
not forwarded by their parties
or people who, for one reason or
the other, believe that some
candidates are not qualified to
be in the position that they are
aspiring, either by character,
age, past convictions or other
reasons.
Hear Umeadi Jnr:"So
ideally, it is now that we are
supposed to be receiving the
complaints that we have been
receiving. You know the system
operates not only here in INEC
but everywhere because the
system appears porous, so the
candidates themselves get to
know what the position is before
we are informed.
He concluded that: “ some of
them are pro-active in either
going to court or presenting
their petitions before we
received the list. I can confirm
that even before the list came,
we have received tons of
petitions here, and by the time
we received the candidates lists
(from the political parties), we
discovered that they knew what
they were talking about,”
|