|
PETITION IN RESPECT OF THE CANDIDACY OF
CHIEF HOPE UZODINMA FOR THE IMO WEST
SENATORIAL DISTRICT
We have been briefed by the Orlu Progressive
Indigenes led by Mr. Longers Umeh of Ihioma
town in Orlu in respect of questions they
have raised over the candidacy of one Chief
Hope Uzodinma who is a Senatorial aspirant
for the Imo West Senatorial District.
We have decided to write this petition to
you out of our deep concern regarding the
credentials and integrity of those you
intend to field to contest for various
elective offices in the country. As the
largest party in Africa, we are sure your
Party can boast of quality men and women in
various fields of human endeavour that you
can sponsor to run for various offices,
hence you will have no qualms at all in
dropping anyone who you come to realize will
constitute an embarrassing albatross to the
Party in terms of credibility, competence
and qualification.
One of such persons we enjoin you to take a
closer look at is Chief Hope Uzodinma who is
an aspirant for the Imo West Senatorial
District. The following cases/issues in
respect of Chief Hope Uzodinma which we
hereby highlight hereunder raise serious
questions about his credibility to vie for
the said office and whether the Peoples’
Democratic Party may not eventually end up
loosing the right to field any candidate for
that Senatorial District if you decide to
field the said Chief Hope Uzodinma.
CASE NUMBER ONE: FUGITIVE FROM THE LAW
Sometime in 2005, Springbank Plc, lodged a
complaint with the Economic and Financial
Crimes Commission against Chief Hope
Uzodinma for fraudulent diversion and
obtaining money under false pretences. After
a thorough investigation, the Commission
found a prima facie case against him and
filed a nine-count charge against him at the
High Court of Lagos State, Ikeja Division in
Charge No. ID/82C/2008: F.R.N V. HOPE
UZODINMA. (Kindly find attached a copy of
the charge sheet and correspondence from the
complainant bank).
Since the charge was filed against him, he
has fled from the long arms of the law and
has been running from pillar to post trying
to frustrate his arraignment. The matter has
come up severally in court, and on each
occasion the court was informed by the
E.F.C.C that Chief Hope Uzodinma is at
large, meaning he is a fugitive from the
law. Pray, what manner of person (especially
one who aspires to be a lawmaker) will run
away from justice? Imagine the embarrassment
to your party if law enforcement agents lie
in wait for your candidate and arrest him on
election day or during inauguration in the
full glare of the public. Or just imagine if
he wins the general election as your
candidate and he is eventually convicted and
loses his seat. Can your party afford such
moral crises?
Kindly recall that your predecessor in
office, Chief Vincent Ogbulafor, who was
even an elected National Chairman of your
Party, was made to resign his position based
on
a mere criminal charge that was filed
against him. That is the moral standard that
your Party has set for itself. And here we
are talking of an individual who has not
even been screened and passed fit to be an
aspirant of the Party.
The other reason we have brought this matter
to your attention is to formally inform you
that one of your own is a wanted man and if
you do not advise him to report himself to
the EFCC for his arraignment and trial when
he presents himself for screening, then you
will be aiding and abetting a crime. Please,
take the hint and do what is needful.
CASE NO.2: UZODINMA ON THE VERGE OF
BANKRUPTCY
Chief Hope Uzodinma is the majority
shareholder and the Managing Director of
Transurb Technical Consult Ltd. The company
is presently indebted to Bank PHB in the sum
of N690,000,000.00 (Six Hundred and Ninety
Million Naira), not to mention her debts
with other banks.
As a result, there is presently a subsisting
suit pending against the company at the High
Court of Justice, Lagos State, Lagos
Division before Justice Onyeabor. The suit
is to the effect that Transurb Technical
Consult Ltd be wound up and the Directors
(including Chief Hope Uzodinma) be declared
bankrupt as loans collected by the company
have not been serviced and cannot be repaid.
Mr. Chairman, imagine the embarrassment to
your Party if on the eve of the elections,
your candidate is declared bankrupt.
In addition to the above, by the Annual
Returns filed on behalf of the company, no
particulars of indebtedness was presented.
This is in clear breach of section 331(2)(a)
of the Company’s and Allied Matters Act
which states that:
"The accounting records shall be sufficient
to show and explain the transactions of the
company and shall be such as to
(a) disclose with
reasonable accuracy of any time, the
financial position of the company.
Section 331(3b) CAMA states -
"The accounting records shall in particular
contain a record of the assets and
liabilities of the company".
From the financial statements of affairs,
filed alongside the Annual Return forms on
behalf of the company, it is clear that the
company is in default. Though we concede
that a company is a body corporate capable
of suing and sued in its corporate name,
however, section 331(1) of the CAMA goes
further to state:
“if a company fails to comply with any
provision of Section 331 or 332(1) of this
Act ,every officer of a company who is in
default shall be guilty of an offence unless
he shows that he acted honestly and that in
the circumstances in which the business of
the company was carried on the default was
excusable"
Section 332(2) states as follows:
"an officer of a company shall be guilty of
an offence if he fails to take all
reasonable steps for securing compliance by
the company with section 322 of this Act or
has intentionally caused any default by the
company under it.”
It should be noted that so far, in line with
sections 331, 332, 333 and 371 of the CAMA
1990, the financial statement of company
makes no recourse to her debts. It can
therefore be said, that these loans as
secured by the company through her
directors, were secured by her directors for
their own personal aggrandizement and
therefore in contravention of section 331,
332, 333 and 371 of the CAMA 1990.
Sir, in line with Section 66(1)(e) of the
1999 Constitution, no person shall be
qualified for election to the Senate or
House of Representations if he is an
undischarged bankrupt having been adjudged
or otherwise declared bankrupt under
any law in force in any part of Nigeria.
As earlier indicated there is presently a
subsisting suit to the effect that Transurb
Technical Consult Ltd be wound up and her
directors declared bankrupt. It is therefore
advisable that a candidate with such
antecedent should not be allowed by the
party to contest an elective post so as not
to truncate the aim and aspirations of the
party if eventually declared bankrupt by the
court. It will be a big risk for the party.
Kindly find attached all relevant documents
in respect of the above matter.
CONCLUSION
We have decided to bring all the above facts
to your attention because we believe that,
as a responsible Party, you will not
deliberately sponsor candidates with such
heavy moral and legal burden hanging around
their necks. This is especially so as you
are not short of alternative men and women
of proven integrity and track records to fly
your flag.
We call on you to fulfill your promise to
the electorates to field only men and women
of high integrity to run for political
offices by refusing to clear Chief Hope
Uzodinma as even an aspirant to the Imo West
Senatorial District and to advise him
to submit himself to the law by going to
face his criminal trial in court for
obtaining money by false pretences,
popularly called 419.
Our clients are prepared to pursue this
matter to its logical conclusion in case you
opt to ignore our information and to field
him as your candidate.
Accept our best wishes.
I remain yours most trusted.
FESTUS KEYAMO, ESQ.
HEAD OF CHAMBERS
.This petition dated Friday, December
10, 2010 was addressed
to
The National Chairman, Peoples’
Democratic Party, P.D.P National
Headquarters, Wuse, Zone 5, Abuja.
|