|
Reforming our Dysfunctional Public Service
By
Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai
Newsdiaryonline Sat
Oct 1,2011

Public Service in Context
It is both a truism that
no nation develops beyond the capacity of its public service,
and there is broad consensus amongst Nigerians that our public
service is broken and dysfunctional. The quality of public
servants and the services they provide to our nation are both
below expectations. From the glorious days at independence when
the best and brightest graduates competed to join the
administrative service up until 1970s, our public service is now
seen as employer of the dull, the lazy and the venal.
We need to retrieve our
old public service - effective, well paid and largely
meritocratic, attracting bright people imbibed with a spirit of
promoting public good.
The Nigerian civil
service evolved from the colonial service with its historical
British roots of an independent, non-political and meritocratic
administrative machinery for governing the country. Each region
then had its civil service in
addition to the federal service.
What is the public
service? How did our public evolve from inception to excellence
and now its current abysmal state of ineffectiveness? How can
the public service be reformed, re-skilled and right-sized to
provide the basic social services that will earn the trust of
Nigerians and foreigners alike?
The Public Service - An Overview
The public service
consists of the civil service - career staff whose appointment,
promotion and discipline are under the exclusive control of the
Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC), national assembly
service, the Judiciary, public officers in the military, police
and paramilitary services, employees of parastatals, educational
and health institutions. By September 2005, when the Public
Service Reform Team (PSRT) was constituted, the number of
federal public servants was slightly above one million. The
estimated number working for the 36 states and the FCT was
another 2 million, broken down as follows:
·
Federal Core
Civil Servants, including some 2,000 directors
180,000
·
Uniformed
Services - Military, Police and Paramilitary Services
457,000
·
Parastatals,
Agencies, Educational and Health Institutions
470,000
·
Total Federal Public Service
1,107,000
·
Public
Officers at the State Level - 36 States (Estimate)
856,000
·
Public
Officers in the Federal Capital Territory Administration
19,000
·
Public
Officers at the 774 Local Governments and 6 FCT Area Councils
620,000
·
Total Sub-National Public Service
1,495,000
·
TOTAL: Public Sector Employees in Nigeria
2,602,000
Adjusting for the increasing numbers of aides
of the president, ministers, governors and legislators, it is
not unreasonable to put the total number of those working
directly for governments at about three million. So while our
national population has increased by about 160% between 1960 and
1999, the size of our public service increased by 350% in the
same period. Our public service is clearly over-bloated.
Other initial diagnostics and findings of the
PSRT were sobering to say the least.
The civil service was rapidly ageing, mostly untrained
and largely under-educated. Their average age then was 42 years,
and over 60% were over 40 years. Less than 12% of the public
servants held university degrees or equivalent. Over 70% of the
service were of the junior grades 01-06, of sub-clerical and
equivalent skills. About 20% of the public service employees
were 'ghost workers' - non-existent people on the payroll which
goes to staff of personnel and accounts departments. In the FCT,
out of an initial headcount of 26,000, we found 3,000 ghosts in
the first round of audit. By the time we introduced biometric ID
and centralized, computerized payroll, we found nearly 2,500 who
failed to show up for documentation!
While the public service pay is low relative
to the cost of living, the overall burden of payroll as a
percentage of the budget is huge. In most states other than
Lagos, Kano, Kaduna and Rivers States, an average of 50% of the
budget goes towards the payment of salaries - to about 1% of
their population - an unfair and unsustainable state of affairs!
Out of the N2,425 billion included in the 2011 Budget for
recurrent expenditure, between 73% and 84% for each MDA
constitutes personnel cost. We found in 2005 that the breakdown
of federal public service emoluments by class of service as
follows:
·
Core Civil
Service
- 18%
·
Military,
Police and Paramilitary
- 35%
·
Parastatals,
Education and Health
- 47%
The PSRT inherited a federal public service
whose central management organs - the FCSC and the office of the
Head of Civil Service of the Federation had become inept and
ineffective, and morally flexible at best. We learnt that
appointments, promotion examinations, promotions, postings and
discipline were bought and sold by civil servants the same way
shares are traded on the stock market. Surprisingly and with
some relief, we did not see these malfunctions in the armed
services. The HR system of the Army, Navy and the Air Force were
intact, and to some extent even the Police and other
paramilitary services had better human resource management
systems.
In a
State of Denial?
The bulk of the public servants continue to
be in denial and have refused to take responsibility for the
sorry state of affairs, blaming their political masters for the
dysfunction in the public service. They blame the collapse of
merit and excellence in the public service on the
Murtala-Obasanjo retirements "with immediate effect" that
occurred in the mid-1970s. Others attribute the current
situation to the Civil Service Reform Decree No. 43 of 1988 of
the Babangida administration. The deterioration of pay and
fringe benefits relative to the cost of living as a result of
the Structural Adjustment Program in the late 1980s has also
been identified as contributory to the de-motivation, deskilling
and dispiriting of the public service.
The truth may be a combination of all three
and more, compounded by the inability of the public service to
update its attitudes, working methods, skills and technology.
The public service has been short-term in its vision,
self-centered in policy formulation and corrupt in programme
implementation.
Instead, it has focused on taking care of itself and interests
to the detriment of the nation and system which sustains it. The
public service failed to reform itself between 2001 and 2005
when two successive Heads of Civil Service were tasked to do so.
It was therefore inevitable that driving the public service
reforms of 2005-2007 had to be transferred to the economic team,
with President Obasanjo leading the charge himself. An outsider
was needed to administer the required medicine, but still needed
the cooperation of the patient, which was not forthcoming.
Public Service Reforms in Perspective
It is therefore uncontestable that the public
service became dysfunctional following years of neglect and
failure to reform. The public service was both large and
unwieldy, accountability was weak and professional standards
low. The federal bureaucracy has also sprawled with considerable
overlap of functions between agencies, and between tiers and
arms of government. There was an urgent need for both civil
service and parastatals reforms, and in spite of all efforts,
little progress has been made in that regard.
The need to improve the overall efficiency
and effectiveness of the public service have been recognized
from pre-independence days by instituting several administrative
reforms. The first of these was the Tudor Davis Commission of
1945-46. The Morgan Commission of 1963 not only revised salaries
and wages of junior staff of the federal government but
introduced for the first time a minimum wage for each region of
the country. The more recent ones include the commissions headed
by Simeon Adebo (1971), Jerome Udoji (1972), Dotun Philips
(1986) and the Allison Ayida Panel (1995). The Dotun Philips
reforms properly and correctly aligned the civil service
structure with the constitution and presidential system of
government , designating permanent secretaries as
directors-general and deputy ministers. Unfortunately, the
reforms devolved human resource functions with respect to junior
cadres to ministries with disastrous consequences which needed
dealing with.
The Bureau of Public Service Reforms (BPSR)
was established in September 2003 as an independent agency in
the Presidency to ensure
the reform of all Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) of
all arms and branches of the federal government, and submit
quarterly reports to the President. The Public Service Reform
Team (PSRT) had the BPSR as its secretariat and met weekly every
Tuesday to deliver on its mandate.
Some of the achievements of that round of reforms
include:
1.
Restructuring of Pilot Ministries, Departments and Agencies
(MDAs):
The PSRT produced two generic guidelines approved by the
Federal Executive Council (FEC) in March 2006 for the reform and
restructuring of MDAs and Parastatals. Initially 5 pilot MDAs
volunteered for restructuring and this was expanded to 14. This
entailed cleaning up the staff headcount and payroll, and
redesigning the MDA structure to have between 4 and 8
departments and 2-4 divisions per department.
These were approved by
the FEC on May 16th, 2007 and applicable to all MDAs
immediately.
2.
Cleaning up of Civil Service and Parastatals Nominal Rolls:
The Oronsaye committee of the PSRT developed eight criteria for
the retirement of public servants to enable the clean-up of the
headcount and reducing the negative impact of the devolution of
HR functions to MDAs in 1988, and the failures of the FCSC and
OHCSF to discharge their functions.
An appeals process was put in place to minimize
victimization and errors.
For the civil service,
about 45,000 names were prepared by MDAs and forwarded to BPSR
for consideration and approval by PSRT, and then forwarded to
the FCSC for removal.
An initial batch of 36,843 officers were put through
pre-retirement training, disengaged and paid about N24 billion
as their severance entitlements. Unfortunately, about 20,000 of
these severed civil servants have found their ways back into the
civil service, thereby defeating the clean-up exercise.
For the 400 or so
parastatals and paramilitary services, the estimated number of
staff to be severed was 75,575 at a cost about N57 billion.
Parastatals reform and right-sizing was to be undertaken jointly
by BPSR and the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE). Sadly, this
was never fully realized.
3.
Monetization of Fringe Benefits:
All benefits-in-kind like free housing, furnishing, car and
driver for various cadres of public servants and political
office holders were abolished for ministers, permanent
secretaries and equivalent cadres and below. All
government-owned houses except 13 classes of official residences
were sold to occupants or via public bids. All official vehicles
were discounted by 50% and sold to officials. Other pool and
utility vehicles were auctioned in public bids. Personal
drivers, cooks and cleaners were laid off and made staff of the
affected officials.
4.
Pay
Reform and Medium-Term Pay Policy:
The Ernest Shonekan Pay Review Report was referred to PSRT for
consideration and implementation. Shonekan found that public
service pay was on average 25% of private sector for the same or
similar jobs. A pay increase of 15% was therefore recommended
and effected in January 2007, with a plan to increase pay by 10%
per annum but linked to productivity such that in 5 years, near
pay parity with the private sector will be achieved.
5.
Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System (IPPIS):
This is a computerized, biometric platform intended to provide a
reliable and comprehensive database of employees in the public
service to facilitate manpower planning, and eliminate headcount
and payroll fraud. IPPIS approved by the FEC in February 2006
and implemented in phases. The first phase covering 6 MDAs and
the central management organizations of the public service went
live in April 2007, saving N416 million from the payroll of the
12 agencies in its first month! Sadly, the vested interests in
the public service have frustrated its mainstreaming and
application to cover all MDAs and other public service
organizations since then.
6.
Review and Update of Public Service Rules and Financial
Regulations: The BPSR undertook a
holistic review of the Public Service Rules and Financial
Regulations and produced a White Paper which was amended and
approved by the FEC on 9th May 2007.
Another review committee led by Adamu Fika
lamented the low morale and widespread malaise in the service
and observed that the integrity deficits in the FCSC and the
Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation are
responsible for inefficiencies and corruption that have become
pervasive in the service.
Next
Steps in Reforming the Public Service
This administration has a unique opportunity
to correct these by appointing not only a reformist head of
civil service, but the nomination of the chair and members of
FCSC within the next few weeks with the mandate to clean up the
service, and build on the reforms of 2005 to 2009.
The next steps are clear. Learn from recent
past, build on foundations laid by PSRT and correct any errors
we made. The quality of the public service must be improved by
attracting the best and brightest. This requires reducing the
current pay disparity between
the public and private sectors of the economy. To rejuvenate the
service, new blood must be injected at all levels from the
academia, private sector and Nigerian Diaspora based on merit.
These will be impossible unless the ageing and un-trainable
public servants take early retirement.
Who can perform in today's work environment
without the knowledge of IT, of using Google, Twitter and
BlackBerry messaging tools? Any public servant that cannot use
the computer and its various tools ought to give way to our army
of young people that can. The number of MDAs duplicating
functions, and their manning levels must be reviewed downwards
to enable our nation afford the higher pay that our public
servants deserve. We cannot maintain the same numbers we have
and pay them any higher.
All these require careful thought, thorough
collection and analysis of data, and political will. Our public
service is once again at a cross-roads. It is up to the
President to make the choices necessary to make it better, or
much worse.
Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, OFR was Senior Policy Adviser to General
Abdulsalami Abubakar (1998-99), Director-General of the Bureau
of Public Enterprises (1999-2003), Minister of the Federal
Capital Territory, Member of the Economic Team, (2003-2007) and
Chairman of the Public Service Reform Team (2005-2007).
|