|
Strike:BLUF accuses FG of drifting towards authoritarian regime
,says NLC/TUC did not consult CSOs
By Danlami Nmodu
Newsdiaryonline Mon Jan 16,2012

OccupyNigeria Protest
A coalition of Civil Society Organizations,BLUF has debunked
claims by labour unions that they consulted with all allies
before suspending the strike today in Abuja.At
a press conference, BLUF said “On the NLC/TUC’s position calling
of the strikes and protests against the removal of subsidy, we
state unequivocally that organised civil society groups and the
generality of Nigerian workers were not consulted before
the Labour presidents took their decisions. Our representatives
to the negotiations were not consulted before actions were
taken. We do not support the position; we insist on complete
reversal before Nigerians will call off their agitations for
fairness and dignity’’
The civil society coalition which condemned
the form and substance of President Goodluck Jonathan’s address
today said “The
tone of the address was reminiscent of the era of military
dictatorship when political generals talked down to the people,
warned them and threatened to deal with them as if they were not
citizens with rights and interests. The form and substance of
the address was to blackmail civil society and citizen groups of
having a regime change agenda. Protests and opposition to a
policy agenda unilaterally imposed by the President on the
teeming millions of Nigerians suffering from its effects were
translated as enemy action that would be dealt with the
repressive apparatuses of the State
And the group
warned
warned that given the manner government handled the
protests, Nigeria may be drifting yet again towards
authoritarian rule. “The political colouration and
anti-opposition stance adopted by the government and many media
outfits is also deplorable. The public is being given an
impression that the participation of people with opposing views
is inimical for our democracy. Nothing is farther from the
truth. As a people’s movement that is not just made up of Labour
or civil society, it is our belief that President Jonathan’s
attempt to decimate opposition voices is most unfortunate. This
is more so as the government is introducing ethno-religious
dimensions to discussions, with far-reaching implications for
our national security. We alert Nigerians that we are finding
ourselves in the early stages of an authoritarian regime.”
BLUF during the strike revealed that the FG
lied about the exact subsidy figure paid last yeat.BLUF
said as correctly reported by Newsdiaryonline.com that
FG actually paid N1.6 trillion as subsidy on fuel to the
oil cabal rather than the N1.3trillion
openly quoted by
government officials.
It was therefore not surprising that
BLUF said today that “ We are appreciative of the move by the
Federal Government of Nigeria, through the Honorable Minister
for Petroleum, to commence investigations into the series of
payments relating to “oil subsidy”. In addition, we acknowledge
the willingness of the FGN to now study and act on the KPMG
Audit Report of the NNPC among others as part of the renewed
anticorruption drive by the GEJ Administration. Furthermore, we
note the resolve of the Executive arm of government to liaise
with the NASS for the expedited passage of the Petroleum
Industry Bill (PIB). Our concern remains that these laudable
steps shall not be “Nigerianised” and made to just placate
Nigerians for the spur of the moment. We implore the renewed
EFCC to deepen the series of investigation beyond the cosmetic
and media blitz that have characterized the operations of the
organisation. We are convinced that the NASS shall live up to
their Constitutional Responsibilities and do a thorough job in
this regard.”
Read the full text of
the press conference below:
BLUF
(Building
Leverage and Unity on Fuel Subsidy Struggle)
Text of Press Conference, Abuja, 16th January 2012
The Fuel Subsidy Struggle: Remove Corruption, Not Subsidy
This morning, President Goodluck Jonathan addressed the nation
on the Fuel Subsidy Regime (FSR). He focused on his agenda for
the deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector. The
President accused Nigerians for their actions which he said had
caused “a disruption of economic activities”. He also alleged
that “a near-breakdown of law and order in certain parts of the
country as a result of the activities of some persons or groups
of persons who took advantage of the situation to further their
narrow interests by engaging in acts of intimidation, harassment
and outright subversion of the Nigerian state”.
The tone of the address was reminiscent of the era of military
dictatorship when political generals talked down to the people,
warned them and threatened to deal with them as if they were not
citizens with rights and interests. The form and substance of
the address was to blackmail civil society and citizen groups of
having a regime change agenda. Protests and opposition to a
policy agenda unilaterally imposed by the President on the
teeming millions of Nigerians suffering from its effects were
translated as enemy action that would be dealt with the
repressive apparatuses of the State.
We note with consternation the military occupation of numerous
sites in our towns and cities by military tanks and hardware as
if we are in war. Of concern include the occupation of the
military at Ojota (Gani Fawehimin Square) Surulere, Maryland
among others in Lagos; the Berger Roundabout and the Wuse II
intersect by ASCON Filling Station in Abuja; the Lugard House
Roundabout in Kaduna; and the nodule junctions in Kano; just to
name a few. We recognize that it is the constitutional
prerogative of Mr. President to deploy the military for internal
security manoeuvres as the President, Commander-in-Chief of the
Armed Forces of Nigeria. However, we are quick to add that the
implications are very simple, that the responsibility for
violations and abuse of the fundamental human rights of citizens
by the deployed military personnel lies squarely at the purview
of Dr. Goodluck Ebelle Jonathan, GCFR.
On the issue of increase of fuel prices, he reaffirmed his
position that his government will “will continue to pursue full
deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector”, but will for
the moment reduce the pump price of petrol to N97 per litre. The
Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) was then
directed to ensure compliance with this new pump price. The
message of the millions of Nigerians in all our cities, towns
and villages protesting against the policy is completely lost on
the President. More importantly, the democratic demands that
unilateral action by the Executive on such a sensitive issue is
unacceptable is.
Our coalition notes
with concern the deliberate and concerted efforts of the FGN
aimed at the “divide and rule” of the larger civil society; and
frown at the systematic name-tagging of CSOs as security risk,
which has been the ostensible reason for government to reinforce
militancy in the country. This is evident in the fact that the
leadership of the oil workers’ unions started receiving threats
from government-sponsored former militants after declaring their
intention to shut down oil production. The other evidence is the
undue flooding of the streets by military personnel this morning
after the President’s speech, as an effort to thwart the
people’s right to peaceful protest.
We condemn the narrowing of access to mainstream media, which
have been coerced into denying Nigerians a fair share of space
as required by extant broadcast regulatory frameworks. An
orchestrated media campaign is beng used to dehumanise Nigerians
as their rights to hold and express opinions have been violated,
especially by state broadcasters, the Nigerian Television
Authority (NTA) and the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria
(FRCN). We equally note with concern the purchase of airtime in
the commercial private broadcasts stations by the government to
further the propaganda agenda of FGN. All these have reinforced
the use of alternate and social media by Nigerians to express
themselves and canvass their genuine demands. It is therefore
disturbing that the Honorable Minister for Information, Labaran
Maku, has now found it necessary to complain about the social
media platforms being used by Nigerians in the face of the
muscling and narrowing of the traditional media.
The political colouration and anti-opposition stance adopted by
the government and many media outfits is also deplorable. The
public is being given an impression that the participation of
people with opposing views is inimical for our democracy.
Nothing is farther from the truth. As a people’s movement that
is not just made up of Labour or civil society, it is our belief
that President Jonathan’s attempt to decimate opposition voices
is most unfortunate. This is more so as the government is
introducing ethno-religious dimensions to discussions, with
far-reaching implications for our national security. We alert
Nigerians that we are finding ourselves in the early stages of
an authoritarian regime.
We are appreciative of the move by the Federal Government of
Nigeria, through the Honorable Minister for Petroleum, to
commence investigations into the series of payments relating to
“oil subsidy”. In addition, we acknowledge the willingness of
the FGN to now study and act on the KPMG Audit Report of the
NNPC among others as part of the renewed anticorruption drive by
the GEJ Administration. Furthermore, we note the resolve of the
Executive arm of government to liaise with the NASS for the
expedited passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB). Our
concern remains that these laudable steps shall not be “Nigerianised”
and made to just placate Nigerians for the spur of the moment.
We implore the renewed EFCC to deepen the series of
investigation beyond the cosmetic and media blitz that have
characterized the operations of the organisation. We are
convinced that the NASS shall live up to their Constitutional
Responsibilities and do a thorough job in this regard.
On the NLC/TUC’s position calling of the strikes and protests
against the removal of subsidy, we state unequivocally that
organised civil society groups and the generality of Nigerian
workers were not consulted before the Labour presidents took
their decisions. Our representatives to the negotiations were
not consulted before actions were taken. We do not support the
position; we insist on complete reversal before Nigerians will
call off their agitations for fairness and dignity.
Finally, we note with concern the posture of international
community who have watched as President Goodluck Jonathan
authorised the cold-blooded murder of 20 innocent, unarmed, and
nonviolent protesters and now the deployment of soldiers onto
the streets at a time when there is no insurrection nor threat
of invasion. We call on all organs of the African Union, the
United Nations and other world institutions that care about the
spread of democracy to condemn this increasing authoritarian
disposition. President Jonathan must note that he will be held
liable any mishaps as a result of using the military for
quelling a civil protest.
Signed:
Dr. Jibrin Ibrahim
Director, Centre for Democracy and Development
Ayodeji Ajayeoba
President, United Action for Democracy
Ayisha Osori
Director, Advocates for Change and Social Justice
Dr. Otive Igbuzor
Executive Director, Centre LSD
Dr. Hussaini Abdu
Country Director, Action Aid Nigeria
Priscilla Achakpa
Women Environmental Programme
For and on Behalf of Nigeria Civil Society, Building Leverage
and Unity on Fuel Subsidy Struggle (BLUF)
16th January 2012
Related
FG lied, paid higher subsidy
figure to oil cabal, says BLUF
Sack
Okonjo-Iweala Now! Civil
Society group tells Jonathan, unveils
citizens’ charter
of demands
Subsidy Removal Protest:
CISLAC Decries Dehumanization Of Nigerians By Police
Nigerians’ Right
to Protest NOT Subject to any Court Order,say
CSOs
Jonathan confirms
Newsdiaryonline story, outlines cost- cutting
measures in address to the Nation :Text of the
broadcast
|