HOME | ABOUT US | NEWS | BUSINESS | POLITICS | COLUMNS | INTERVIEWS | ARCHIVE | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US FOLLOW US ON TWITTER JOIN US ON FACEBOOK


 

BREAKING NEWS

 

Revealed :Identity of SSS Assistant Director Killed in October 2010 bomb Blast
By Danlami Nmodu   Newsdiaryonline    Sat Sep 17,2011

Comrade Abiodun Aremu in  his article titled “ Re: Bombing of the UN: Our Chicken is Roosting The Call For Organised Revolution! (1)” sent to Newsdiaryonline  today named Prince Tosho Sulyman, aka Black Scorpion as the State Security  Service, SSS assistant director (whose identity was not disclosed) that was  killed in the October 1st 2010 bomb-blast at the Eagle square in Abuja.

In the piece which is a reaction to protests against his earlier opinion on the issue of revolution,Aremu said “My friend of 3 decades (Prince Tosho Sulyman, aka Black Scorpion) was the SSS Assistant Director (whose identity was not disclosed), killed in the October 1st 2010 bomb-blast at the Eagle Square, Abuja, in which the Jonathan presidency without preliminary investigation, goofed that MEND couldn’t have been responsible for the act. I didn’t need to agonise over it because we have all become victims of a society that has thrown compassion to its people to the wind. Therefore, the opinion was not about agonising but to challenge us to restore sanity and humanity to our society.”

Read the full text of his article below to understand the context within which he made the revelation

 

Re: Bombing of the UN: Our Chicken is Roosting

The Call For Organised Revolution! (1)

Comrade ABIODUN AREMU, biod_abi@yahoo.co.uk

My opinion: Bombing of the UN: Our Chicken is Roosting published by the Sahara Reporters and other media two weeks ago, expectedly generated some sharp reactions by those who could never understand the philosophy underlying the interpretation of social realities of the Nigeria nation-state. I have repeatedly in the last two decades rephrased that: “we have been so much used to lies and falsehoods to the point that when there is a moment of truth, we tremble. We hate to be confronted with the truth and for me; such reactions count least so long as the said opinion rests on the objective realities in our polity. If the opinion in any way offends the sensibility of the individuals, the truth should be confronted and not me.

A point of information to such reactions that claimed the opinion was: “stupidly provocative”, “hatred for the global community”, “hater of Jonathan”, “why didn’t you call for revolution during Obasanjo regime? Why the call when it is Jonathan – a South-South that is in power” and the rest. My friend of 3 decades (Prince Tosho Sulyman, aka Black Scorpion) was the SSS Assistant Director (whose identity was not disclosed), killed in the October 1st 2010 bomb-blast at the Eagle Square, Abuja, in which the Jonathan presidency without preliminary investigation, goofed that MEND couldn’t have been responsible for the act. I didn’t need to agonise over it because we have all become victims of a society that has thrown compassion to its people to the wind. Therefore, the opinion was not about agonising but to challenge us to restore sanity and humanity to our society.

In the aforesaid opinion, I concluded “THIS IS MY CALL TO ORGANISED REVOLUTION AS WE CELEBRATE EID FITR”; however, the current discourse is to set the fact straight on the conclusion of that previous opinion. It is important to emphasise the point that a revolution is an organised process and not just an occurrence in a flash; because the epithet “revolution” has been so much misused and distorted in recent times in our country by the voices of the oppressed and also by members and apostles of the ruling cabals.

Revolution is not a mere violent act or disruption of the existing socio-political order as in a coup d’état or spontaneous protest/mass uprising or armed violence. The struggle to attain political power through whatever means; be it mass uprising, revolt, resistance, guerrilla warfare, armed struggle, mass actions, strike, are by no means the revolution. These are just methods used overtime in bringing about a revolution.

The dialectical laws (unity of objective and subjective factors) and the role a social revolution should play determine what constitutes a REVOLUTION. In essence, revolution means fundamental change in the WHOLE socio-economic system (replacement of an obsolete social order) and not just a PART of it, as in replacement in governmental structure or the removal of a dictator under the same system of rule.

Revolution must be located in the Modes of Production viz. ownership of the means of production and distribution of the products of production – will it change or is it a continuation of the old order? Will the change in the modes of production leads to change in the political arrangement of the society as different from the old order in such a way that the class interests of the new order predominates viz. economic opportunities, political culture, laws, institutions, etc. In effect, what a power struggle to replace the old order leads to is the determining factor of whether a process is a revolution or not?

The uprisings or so-called Arab spring in Egypt and Tunisia merely replaced the dictators; but have no bearing in the socio-economic foundation of the two societies, the very heart of the injustice, inequalities, unemployment and social frustrations that compelled the uprising. As I said in a previous opinion: “Sad Day for Afrika as Counter-revolution Triumphs in Libya” (also published by Sahara Reporters and other media in Nigeria), the inconclusive US-NATO war of aggression in Libya can never stand as a revolution.

A reversal from a higher phase of the society (with all its limitations) can never constitute a revolution but a counter-revolution. The mere fact of imposed US-NATO models of democratic ethos founded on imperial control of the socio-economic life of the Egyptians and Tunisians to replace dictatorial rule cannot be called a revolution. The revolutions in Europe 18th and 19th centuries that overthrew monarchy took place in the context of economic and political objectives when it became impossible to effect changes through legal and constitutional means.

THE CHALLENGE OF THE NIGERIAN REVOLUTION

The challenge of the Nigerian revolution starts with a correct interpretation of the socio-economic realities of Nigeria and the desirability for revolution. I read Apostle Bakare crusading for a revolution in Nigeria on the basis of corruption. Good that he is a convert to the call for it; but what he calls for is just a PART of why a revolution has become a necessity in Nigeria. A Nigerian revolution, if it must truly obey the dialectical laws of social revolution will base itself on an alliance of the exploited, oppressed, ethnically/religiously dominated and marginalised class forces against the ruling cabals/their cronies and the extant exploitative/oppressive institutions; in view of transforming the Nigerian society on the basis of Humanism and not Moneyism (ala Eskor Toyo).

When I speak of revolution, I speak of social revolution, which must be located in the economic and political arrangement of the society. The economy and politics must focus at humanism, i.e. collective interests and care for all, the religious precepts of which is ‘love thy neighbour as thy self’. The revolution in Nigeria should not be reduced to a change in government but a total change in the structure of the economic and socio-cultural relations. That is when religion of whatever extractions would find its true meaning.

For instance, A Nigerian revolution must free the potentials of the people from Churches harbouring General Overseers that operate private jet of N4bn, an amount that could engage 4,000 graduates as small scale farmers at a million (N1m) Naira guaranteed agricultural inputs and with capacity to engage not less than 5 labour each meant 24,000 primary employment opportunities; not to talk of the secondary levels of employments viz. processing, manufacturing, marketing, transporting, etc.

A major fundamental requirement for the Nigerian revolution is mass political education on politics and economics. The masses must understand what a revolution means, the purpose of the revolution, the goals and methods of achieving the revolution. This will awake the poor Ibibio, Ijaw, Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba, Igbo, Kanuri, Urhobo, Tiv, Idoma, etc on the need for unity on economic and political interests. Mass political education must enhance the perceptive ability to understand why ‘Emperor’ Obasanjo’s 8 years of looting our collective wealth didn’t give free meals to, or upgrade living condition of the Yoruba; and neither will President Jonathan Goodluck being an Ijaw fetches any Ijaw person a bag of rice in the open market. They should know that what is required is the purchasing power (money) and learn from the contradictions of our polity that when they go to bank to open an account or deposit money, where they come from or the religion/faith they belong, is never an issue.

A Nigerian revolution must open mouth-eyes-ears-sense of Nigerians to the realities that when Obasanjo, IBB, Dangote, Jonathan, David Mark, Annenih et al meet to decide their shares in looting our collective wealth, there is nothing like ethnic or religious differences. The mass of the people must be able to define who the common class enemy is irrespective of religion or ethnic. They must be able to understand that even in recent past (1979 – 83) ethnicity and religion didn’t count much in politics, but the programme of the political parties for the people. Otherwise, Jakande and Jafojo both Alhajis would not be Governor and Deputy in Lagos State, Bola Ige and Sunday Afolabi both Christians in old Oyo State now Oyo and Osun States, Adekunle Ajasin and Akin Omoboriowo both Christians in old Ondo State now Ondo and Ekiti States, etc. The ‘Progressives’ in 1979 – 83 [(Aminu Kano (PRP), Obafemi Awolowo (UPN), Waziri Ibrahim (GNPP), Sam Mbakwe (NPP)] were united on socio-economic interests and not ethnic or religious lines.

The method used in a revolution is dictated by the ruling class that is to be displaced. If mere barking at the ruling cabal or vigil prayers will make them to vacate power and voluntarily return the stolen wealth stacked away in Europe and America since the 1970s; one wishes the apostles of non-violent revolution the BEST OF LUCK.

A Nigeria nation-state, which has an ignoble history of brutal repression of unarmed mass protests/strikes with police and armed violence against the people, should be a MAJOR lesson to those who chose the option of the socialist revolutionary transformation. Revolution in Nigeria will have no option than to resort to self-defence BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, including appeal to the armed forces to turn their guns against the rulers and their scores of allied looters/fronts. The thorough going mass education must humble the military to realise that they are first and foremost, human beings who should transcend from the present ‘zombie’ status as instrument of coercion in use to undermine the future of their wives, children and relatives who are equal victims of the decadent order.

We must be able to ask ourselves: is a revolution desirable? Is it possible? You should ask yourself these questions until you reach internal conviction to join the train of a Nigerian revolution because a revolution is not a tea party (a la MAO), it means great sacrifices. Nonetheless, we have options – either to apply ourselves to making a revolution or continue the “sufferings and smiling” way of life till eternity. But we need remember that it was not an accident of our recent history that for close to 350 years we were part of the African people taken as slaves, further colonised for 100 years, and held hostage by neo-colonialism since the 1960 independence.

By October 1st we would be 51 years of independence, but the lessons are, without the resistance to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and to colonialism, we would not have the nominal independence we had since October 1st 1960. But we have lost the independence now economically and politically, and we need to reclaim it.

I remain on side of making revolution in Nigeria, what of you? The discourse continues in Part 2: “Revolutionary Opening & Situation and the Agenda of a Nigeria Revolution”.

September 17th 2011

Related
Bombing Of The UN:Our Chicken Is Coming Home to Roost! By Comrade Abiodun Aremu








 

 

 

 

 


  Share  
HTML Comment Box is loading comments...

Advertising




 

NEWS LINKS  
Watch dog reporters Follow us on Facebook       Follow us on Twitter
Money matter online
Sahara Reporters
NGO Network Magazine
African Examiner  
ChampionsforNigeria
  HOME | ABOUT US | NEWS | BUSINESS | POLITICS | COLUMNS | INTERVIEWS | ARCHIVE | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US FOLLOW US ON TWITTER JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
All Rights Reserved © 2011, News Diary Online.   Site Designed By: Detech Technologies